From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add qscintilla. Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 01:13:33 -0400 Message-ID: <87vaxlnama.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <87wpi9geag.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160918205634.GA11923@jasmine> <20160918210202.GA853@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <8760psjadm.fsf@openmailbox.org> <874m5cm36o.fsf@elephly.net> <871t0gj68z.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160919213214.GA10174@jasmine> <87wpi7imww.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160919235204.GA16382@jasmine> <8737kr92rn.fsf@elephly.net> <20160924033056.GA23603@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43849) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnfHZ-0008Ul-PS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 01:13:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnfHU-0000fq-4E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 01:13:48 -0400 Received: from smtp20.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.54]:41685 helo=smtp5.openmailbox.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnfHT-0000fD-Qy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 01:13:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160924033056.GA23603@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 23 Sep 2016 23:30:56 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari writes: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:02:20PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>=20 >> Leo Famulari writes: >>=20 >> > I'm not sure yet about the other problem. I tried to define 'hi', which >> > inherits from 'hello', and I got a similar error. >>=20 >> I don=E2=80=99t understand this. What is the problem here? >>=20 >> I=E2=80=99m successfully inheriting from packages in other modules. For >> example, we have a separate module for bioinformatics variants. The >> module uses the upstream bioinformatics module and adds its own variants >> of existing packages using inheritance. > > I was getting failures reminiscent of an ABI break. But, I can't > reproduce it now. > > Kei, maybe you should try applying the patches to a fresh Git checkout? > If they work like that, then I think it's okay to push, assuming the > qscintilla URL is fixed. No luck... --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX5gt+AAoJEOal7jwZRnoNgHwQAL+eZ3hPZWuNTwNBB55TCGmW 48kjetDiDgiHAzwtEOFG4R6w85gT316hboGfZ0SDGSZLc9atjrWGuqaz8jU6Ui9L d2QXBqv+UEMR22rIuh1nsJUTU2pO18c1rvnI8EdFOalS5fszlEU1DiA42fai3qD5 KVLdwkTV/7veZhpQzkoknmwkP5du9yitWTUTHt+D3HCto90lC2JO8SIYjRdMT7iC EDiO+bG60nKcVwcwMkYf0npU28D/fvFAvrjQxn4QjIef1/e2tzvf9tgVDzQRYEXj 7k+SCiYNh22yzYLdhGytdF8xWijSEaTkXvr3UGmT6zLfhZEuOPT3eETPcnDXJiwn nDcZoISUQ5BrtQv+/9scBdUuRkXIHqOaJepafXCC0Zbf30o6iDtfoWG3Oax27Bh3 TymcoeFMqMoQyx4HJVBnRAzFfCHod1Jlo0L93/XJgp7VFjwH3Jsu33i3YRMoNfHb /C27jpDeZD1V1wsNazUK57UKH6pAWzYBgQYWWrbfjFIXms52jmGkAcCeB+m9J3dr OJxHmAjq8vs0U9w0fZJhBB7DJJYnvtj6x9eNdK9O3cCov5wA2yTQuyayYddmOsSg n8QxA3DKvN3rZzik8q3FNxvwvXz+HKINiiZd1Y8trzYZnDOe1fuDqMbMqhesOOls /bgsSTIDa0FXYAYQVrry =pdzd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--