From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH][WIP] gnu: Add debbugs. Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 18:15:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87vaxdl5yi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zimti03i.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41373) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bq0T7-0005jC-T0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:15:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bq0T2-0003sl-NA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:15:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zimti03i.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> (ng0's message of "Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:01:05 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org ng0 skribis: > So, here's debbugs. Disclaimer: I never ran or did setup or got in any > way in touch with debbugs on a server. > > Input welcome to adjust. All I know is that we'll need a service to make > this work. I have no reasonable interest in this, so I won't go all the > way. I'd like to fix this package up as far as usage goes. > I can not test it running, but from the build/install perspective it is > done. There are structures in code which can be changed etc, but this > was done in about ~30 minutes to get some input as I thought, hey we use > debbugs.. why do we not have debbugs packaged already? Because nobody did it I guess. Could you send an non-WIP patch? Since you mark it as WIP, people most likely don=E2=80=99t look at it, because there=E2=80=99s already so many pa= tches to review. Please take extra time to test it and resend when you think it=E2=80=99s ready to apply. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.