From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39486)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d5fRp-0005Ow-Q7
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2017 17:35:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d5fRm-0002to-Ia
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2017 17:35:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53433)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1d5fRm-0002td-FC
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2017 17:35:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d5fRm-0005Eb-6G
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2017 17:35:02 -0400
Subject: bug#26746: [PATCH] gnu: bind: Update to 9.11.1.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.26746.B26746.149376087620085@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20170502123428.17304-1-va511e@yahoo.com>
	<20170502173234.GB15523@jasmine>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 23:34:23 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20170502173234.GB15523@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue,
	2 May 2017 13:32:34 -0400")
Message-ID: <87vapjymcg.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: Vasile Dumitrascu <va511e@yahoo.com>, 26746@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Leo,

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 02:34:28PM +0200, Vasile Dumitrascu wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind): Update to 9.11.1.
>> * gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind)[license]: Change isc to mpl2.0.
>
> Thanks! I see that ISC recommends this release for production use,
> although it is labeled "Early Deployment" instead of "Current-Stable".
>
> You can see this production "endorsement" if you hover your mouse over
> the "Early Deployment" text in the BIND tab:
>
> https://www.isc.org/downloads/
>
> Does anyone see a reason to stick to the 9.10 release series for now?

I would trust ISC=E2=80=99s judgment on this and thus switch to 9.11.1.

> And, should we stick the 9.9 release series for isc-dhcp's bundled BIND
> replacement?

No idea what the implications would be!

Ludo=E2=80=99.