From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36045)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1da2UE-0003ap-TE
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:15:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1da2U9-0003sz-Uy
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:15:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53484)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1da2U9-0003ss-RV
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:15:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1da2U9-0001yg-My
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:15:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#27806] openmpi changes
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.27806.B27806.15009992767555@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <8760ehr8dr.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:14:16 +0200
In-Reply-To: <8760ehr8dr.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk> (Dave Love's
	message of "Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:34:56 +0100")
Message-ID: <87vamgjxyf.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Dave Love <fx@gnu.org>
Cc: 27806@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Dave,

I adjusted the commit log and applied the first two patches.

Dave Love <fx@gnu.org> skribis:

> I assume the only one of these that's questionable is the SGE one.  It
> used to be the default, and I don't know of any way it could be
> problematic -- the support just looks at the environment to determine
> whether to use qrsh for remote startup.  Debian and Fedora both enable
> it.

To be clear: if there=E2=80=99s no environment variable suggesting that SGE=
 is
being used, then it won=E2=80=99t try to use qrsh, right?

If so that seems reasonable to me.  I=E2=80=99ll push the patch if there ar=
e no
objections.

Thank you,
Ludo=E2=80=99.