From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?Let=E2=80=99s?= meet before FOSDEM! Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:50:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87vailwvnl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87inem6wd2.fsf@gnu.org> <86lgjitadp.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41579) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCChf-0002X0-H7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 17:50:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCChe-0000ZZ-Mf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 17:50:43 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:53502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCChe-0000Yv-FO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 17:50:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <86lgjitadp.fsf@gmail.com> (myglc2@gmail.com's message of "Tue, 07 Nov 2017 09:46:10 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: myglc2 Cc: Guix-devel , Pjotr Prins myglc2 skribis: > I am thinking of coming from Boston on the cheap to finally put a face > on all you helpful Guixers, and maybe go to FOSDEM. > > My personal interests are HPC, reproducible research, Cuirass, and > "user-level" use of git pull instead of guix pull. Cool! > Are you saying there will be no Guix discussion at FOSDEM? There will be no =E2=80=9Cdeveloper room=E2=80=9D akin to what we had for t= he last couple of years=C2=B9 (we had a Guile/Guix track at FOSDEM for half a day a= nd then for a whole day, which was awesome.) Hopefully there=E2=80=99ll be a couple of Guix talks in other tracks though. Ludo=E2=80=99. =C2=B9 https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-10/msg00061.html