From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoriE-0004nP-3V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:19:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoriA-0003Pm-48 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:19:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47547) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoriA-0003P9-0z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:19:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eori9-0007b1-RY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:19:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#30274] [PATCH 00/21] gnu: Add licensecheck (license checker for source files). Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <87a7wxrdop.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20180128184437.32296-1-go.wigust@gmail.com> <87a7wxrdop.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:18:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87vaep9kg0.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Oleg Pykhalov , 30274@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oleg Pykhalov writes: > The following are new to me, so should I add a "v" in (version =E2=80=A6)= for > those packages? I see for example perl-file-find-object has it. > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > /home/natsu/src/guix-wip-licensecheck/gnu/packages/license.scm:108:2: lic= ensecheck@3.0.31: can be upgraded to v3.0.31 > /home/natsu/src/guix-wip-licensecheck/gnu/packages/license.scm:33:2: perl= -regexp-pattern-license@3.0.31: can be upgraded to v3.0.31 > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- This is a bug in the CPAN updater. We strip the 'v' prefix from package versions, which confuses the updater when upstream uses a 'v' prefix in the metadata. It would be nice to make it ignore that :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlqO0T8ACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPrjowf/Q/pzJfZpbr+bXZlX/Un46IadFBgXIh/Fmd1fLcbNDDDxKey67hP2Hx35 EZmepb384LlQbhH1LH0Ytz7rVqLdZU9FKp55Jj4UbmSKyDuMMFJibnqSurSCEawQ 0hKA3DzZU7AkMDvSfNrzoxK6PdwR+poAsHpSfbTk5GAAVs/TpsO3S4wIzFILlS/8 vxxf3gI+A3uQMiECW31l1u9dRqWmMe62saWDFkUKOVSGa2vI85/bRUHaDOv4iuW1 mjChoNiaopBR2avrrAfTxvEmSxCev+XJnLhc9SgKtlzRxCV7A9E5eGc+0dRemdSV L502MVo1Wi1NKiG3KHeyfehqsdHwhA== =NsGw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--