From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52467) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fdeJ7-0005fv-W4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:19:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fdeJ3-0004E1-Vu for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:19:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49395) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fdeJ3-0004Dl-Ra for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:19:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fdeJ3-0005lv-LZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:19:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#32111] daemon store names can't start with a dot Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20180710124355.12754-1-clement@lassieur.org> <20180710191839.bujbi5ekprczypwv@abyayala> <87o9fenbd0.fsf@lassieur.org> <87va9kx2w3.fsf@gnu.org> <8736wo3814.fsf@lassieur.org> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 18:17:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8736wo3814.fsf@lassieur.org> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur"'s message of "Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:20:23 +0200") Message-ID: <87va9ksa1e.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Cc: Nils Gillmann , 32111-done@debbugs.gnu.org Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Hello Cl=C3=A9ment, >> >> Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur skribis: >> >>> Nils Gillmann writes: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Can you provide some context why this is necessary, maybe even >>>> in the commit message? >>> >>> It's necessary when you want to package a program whose source looks >>> like file:///home/foo/.bar. >> >> I=E2=80=99d rather not make this kind of change. In general, I think we= should >> be very conservative about changes to the daemon and its protocol, >> because that=E2=80=99s the common denominator of all the versions of Gui= x. >> >> If we change something like it, then we=E2=80=99ll get subtle breakage d= epending >> on the version of the daemon in use. >> >> WDYT? > > Okay, let's abandon this then :-) > > CCing bug-guix because I still think it's a bug; please close it if you > disagree. Looks like you already closed it (or was it me?). Anyway, it=E2=80=99s certainly a limitation, but given that it=E2=80=99s an= annoyance more than a showstopper (in my view at least), I=E2=80=99m in favor keeping things this way for the sake of compatibility. Ludo=E2=80=99.