From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35717) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBzVn-0001Oa-OF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 05:50:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBzVj-0000FL-Dr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 05:50:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBzVi-0000Eo-JB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 05:50:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gBzVi-0006uu-BS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 05:50:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#32933] [PATCH] guix: add license prefix hackage imports Resent-Message-ID: References: <87h8hri9sj.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7nioqk6.fsf@elephly.net> <877eijljkf.fsf@gnu.org> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <877eijljkf.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:47:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87va63mthl.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 32933@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > OTOH, the goal of =E2=80=98guix import=E2=80=99 is to provide templates a= s close as > possible to working package definitions. In that sense, if adding the > =E2=80=98license:=E2=80=99 prefix lowers the barrier a little bit (and it= certainly > does, as Joe wrote), the better. > > For the sake of consistency though, it may be best to do it for all the > importers, if we were to take that route. Adding the same prefix to all importers sounds good to me. -- Ricardo