From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: bug#22533: Python bytecode reproducibility
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 22:22:23 +0100
Message-ID: <87va20wos0.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <20160202051544.GA11744@jasmine> <87bmqfu44s.fsf@fastmail.com>
	<87606c23bq.fsf@elephly.net>
	<CAE4v=phoeRvKHG96Y1-_A2TRAK_wNPUyBgMFgq6+Cd9enFScUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<874llw101c.fsf@elephly.net> <871sgz1wg0.fsf@elephly.net>
	<CAE4v=pjfpPfuihBbFVrB_Tx5py3hp+3aaFDJ6E++tHR2YPwXYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87sgxvtl19.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36072)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gqPEF-0004Oc-7b
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 16:23:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gqPEE-0003NV-FV
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 16:23:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58540)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gqPEE-0003MB-7z
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 16:23:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gqPEE-00057F-0x
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 16:23:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.22533.D22533.154922897419635.done@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <87sgxvtl19.fsf@elephly.net>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com>
Cc: 22533-done@debbugs.gnu.org


Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> Now that we=E2=80=99re using Python 3.7 and this version supports hash-ba=
sed pyc
> files, is this still an issue?  Do we need to do anything to enable
> hash-based pyc compilation?
>
> See:
>   https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.7.html#pep-552-hash-based-pyc-files
>   https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0552/

It looks like this is no longer a problem.  I built borg just now and
the pyc files are reproducible.

(The man pages include a date stamp, though, which I=E2=80=99m trying to pa=
tch
now.)

--
Ricardo