From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36009)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hXB0s-0006lM-Rv
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jun 2019 16:54:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hXB0r-0001qu-Pu
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jun 2019 16:54:02 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53439)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hXB0r-0001qq-MY
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jun 2019 16:54:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hXB0r-0005P5-J8
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jun 2019 16:54:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#35970] [PATCH] gnu: Add qview.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.35970.B35970.155942238620701@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <20190528225105.10540-1-mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<874l59h2uh.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2019 22:52:54 +0200
In-Reply-To: <874l59h2uh.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s
	message of "Sat, 01 Jun 2019 15:06:30 +0200")
Message-ID: <87v9xpvxi1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 35970@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello,

Thank you for the review.

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> skribis:
>
>> * gnu/packages/image-viewers.scm (qview): New variable.
>
> [...]
>
>> +    (synopsis "Practical and minimal image viewer")
>                   ^~~~~~~~~
>
> Did you mean =E2=80=9Cconvenient=E2=80=9D?  :-)
> (It surely is practical too, but the same could be said of all the image
> viewers we have.)

OK. Bikeshedding time :)

I used the words from the developers themselves
<https://github.com/jurplel/qView>, so I didn't mean anything in
particular.=20

However, AFAIU, there is a difference between practical and convenient:
the latter suggests some ease of use that the former doesn't. For
example, the `find' utility is practical, but not what I would call
convenient.

Now, I don't have a strong opinion about it. I just wanted to be
faithful to the developers' words.

Bikeshedding time's over.

So, "Practical" or "convenient", or something different, like:

  "Fully-featured yet unobtrusive image viewer"


Regards,

--=20
Nicolas Goaziou