From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:52:20 -0400 Message-ID: <87v9uexwfk.fsf@netris.org> References: <875znwcoo9.fsf@netris.org> <87zhke97xj.fsf@netris.org> <87h86mdaex.fsf@gnu.org> <8736i5a7mb.fsf@netris.org> <87mugdbc9r.fsf@gnu.org> <8736i3iyas.fsf@devup.no> <87zhkbhd07.fsf@devup.no> <87v9uz4msh.fsf@netris.org> <87woffh66h.fsf@devup.no> <874l26y9j0.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0guuwt4.fsf@netris.org> <87zhjw1gfm.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7bvnts4.fsf@netris.org> <87y2zfq746.fsf@gnu.org> <874l22of8l.fsf@netris.org> <87zhjuoarz.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhjumu88.fsf@netris.org> <87k1aym7kf.fsf@netris.org> <87d0gpdjmi.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfvblqiv.fsf@netris.org> <871rx3imj7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36271) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i3myB-0001r9-HE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:54:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i3myA-0007Ah-DM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:54:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46026) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i3myA-0007AU-AS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:54:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <871rx3imj7.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 30 Aug 2019 01:23:24 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 36747@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Mark H Weaver skribis: > >> Thanks. The next evaluation got further, but eventually failed. Again, >> there seems no way to get any details on what went wrong from the web >> interface: >> >> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates-core-updates >> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/7029 > > A Guile build of > /gnu/store/lbbgpkrs9mpw68k1bz0dwpi8ch6gp557-guile-2.2.6.drv had timed > out. I restarted manually earlier today with a larger timeout. It > succeeded and a new evaluation is now =E2=80=9Cin progress=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =A6 Thanks. It has since failed again, same as before. I'm unable to get any information from the web interface on what went wrong. Mark