From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: Using CLISP instead of CCL to bootstrap SBCL
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 14:44:02 +0200
Message-ID: <87v9ua3m25.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
References: <87d0gnljf6.fsf@netris.org> <87o9079hef.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87v9ub57gy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45870)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1i4lgl-0001rj-91
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2019 08:44:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1i4lgj-000634-TY
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2019 08:44:06 -0400
Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:48105)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1i4lgj-00061A-NR
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2019 08:44:05 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87v9ub57gy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

So CCL might be a lost cause.
I've asked SBCL if it's OK to use CLISP 2.49 or ECL:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/1842319

Note that we could also try with CMUCL, which we need to package.

Cheers!

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl1tDpIACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH8jiQf/QqMaAPI/jVFoyMY7Vx0dZp4WVmVB8iiXoTAt5HLjjhUgdubf0+8p7K9l
lyfbdcFjOPAIle6n1/BkOtLeojNp52cRTmTgr6mxxXiVa9vgjeiazKJg4sPE/SZm
oG/nL45uepsGlTyX4UKnhQfQSkA8MepGGLOwNvPGY1gT8R/+ilQXwl1j/PbIRBrD
+0UiqBDHsFpy2tzQDoep3Y1XaUOO9onF+xjCBU3r5Lij0qu8DVphOj6Q+C2Q5nPd
NAFmvI8AP0MY3dTCit9M37E/AJVPV4em5oOarF2nKmk6ZqZZXIrwXYwbLBXGE+b+
e6vVees8ar52NtbfW/Al+Iq0moHiyQ==
=d2nJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--