From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9vAT-000621-Ui for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:52:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9vAR-00049O-7l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:52:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9vAP-00048c-Of for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:52:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9vAP-0000Hg-K6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:52:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#36467] [PATCH v3] gnu: Add some Common Lisp libraries Resent-Message-ID: From: Pierre Neidhardt In-Reply-To: <87d0g06zrf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190701222716.12254-1-glv@posteo.net> <87imr7rak9.fsf@yamatai> <87blw018x7.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2yopqln.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87h85ctjoe.fsf@yamatai> <87d0g06zrf.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:50:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9tsnn9b.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Guillaume Le Vaillant Cc: Katherine Cox-Buday , 36467@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > We discussed whether to add =E2=80=9Cecl-=E2=80=9D packages in the first = place a couple > of months ago IIRC, and I think the outcome was that it=E2=80=99s not wor= th it > most of the time. Do I remember correctly Katherine, Pierre? Hmmm, I don't remember this conversation :p Do you have a link? Those ecl- packages come for free, so it's cool to have them for users using ECL. Admittedly, ECL is way less popular than SBCL, plus the cl- packages can always be used as a fallback. So no strong opinion on my end. Either way, I guess this patch is ready to merge then. ECL packages can always be tweaked later if need be. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl1/y4AACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH/vpwf/WwX3cKa7H49XyVUd3xSmrV8ZWcQDPaNPPHcIeNNwcPeWXUbbxWHgUY0b TMCvzTohijuKAJ+HFYQuPpMcJ5wV7eJHjydU318+leD8y+CcMu1CkYtHKHiULQSd uo9WrRaZfQK7HbV3NkMA41ZC8bbg4rUWZGjDrCLLlOv9OYi1mNJ0sQ3lWLJzC9Pc CFCmZNOqAaZVGFy9fcoXSVeP8PEwb+YfeRp905m/6Pz005EFLI5h6e5arPdTE02l Jb0fyJiy9KT3cfIvJsqSW0VdnOFc2+Wnrj2OEAFXOaXZN9QZzERh5M41RuNJbpNJ gm7yrzog6hKADk5UNv8Ltsduand65g== =7vrt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--