From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: bug#37850: Glib documentation is missing
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 11:04:53 +0200
Message-ID: <87v9sbj2ru.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
References: <87pniq9y2e.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <8736fjwcd2.fsf@devup.no>
 <87wocvwbmy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87pnikldtt.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54052)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iOI0N-0004Gz-Ex
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 05:05:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iOI0M-0001BK-9X
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 05:05:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59096)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1iOI0M-0001BE-6o
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 05:05:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iOI0L-0005RF-W7
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 05:05:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.37850.B37850.157208069920895@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87pnikldtt.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 37850@debbugs.gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Alternately, we could define a new =E2=80=9Cglib-doc=E2=80=9D package tha=
t would depend
> on the current =E2=80=9Cglib=E2=80=9D package, assuming the build system =
allows us to
> build nothing but documentation.

Some possible drawbacks:

=2D It's not consistent with the other Glib/GNOME libraries like gtk+ or
  webkitgtk which have a "doc" output.

=2D Previously we had glib:doc and no measure can be taken to let the user
  know that it's now "glib-doc".

So I would got for the glib-minimal route.

This bring me to another problem: "glib:doc" was not deprecated, so
users who installed "glib:doc" cannot update their manifests / profiles
after a guix pull.

Can we actually deprecate single outputs?
If not, isn't it a bug?

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl20DDUACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH8r8gf+KbyFIKiUVX0xDYn56UVGqyUR8s1h8V3GfS//vNzrxkS/lSyaWdTHeaVp
Oah/GHoGQp2lvROzFOFJm7AZhqOuyR4QaUdS5mFDrvOCh363ZLEGEYak/g8rw76r
79rNylydT8HdkggIhXaqoixNbWgHD6OmWlDEp4nXV9ujDu4L16Qh/rzGu/nbAVfl
9LInaxZApj54rethAW0gXoPs9B/o5pAFpZnvX3elvz5Cw/jZUzI83nBq6U4D618n
azyY682ZVg1gSO231rGVqVxnZUUBH1K6FBT+SiqVsBNXx0uSC+qAD+dqTwZtzAED
8AS1KJvl4KVvN73idqJ5N5QI2mPyEA==
=RxzE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--