From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#36882: Qemu 4.2.0 build for x86_64-linux fails
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:36:12 +0100
Message-ID: <87v9ni92tf.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87k14gnqng.fsf@gmail.com> <87mu9b3crd.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87a75a5taw.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8tptu7u.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87ftf0nx7n.fsf@gmail.com> <87tv3gm59r.fsf@gnu.org>
 <875zfuag6v.fsf@gmail.com> <874kveafns.fsf@gmail.com>
 <874kv6ju1c.fsf@devup.no> <878skh3n0o.fsf@gmail.com>
 <871rq9ejpb.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60230)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j9tUd-0005Xb-5T
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 11:37:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j9tUc-0002Hs-Ba
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 11:37:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37657)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1j9tUc-0002Ho-8C
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 11:37:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j9tUc-0008JW-5c
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 11:37:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36882.B36882.158342618631915@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <871rq9ejpb.fsf@gmail.com> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Tue,
 03 Mar 2020 12:55:44 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
Cc: 36882@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi!

Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com> skribis:

>> Yup, turned out patching GCC was too difficult. I'm experimenting a
>> filter over inputs passed to set-path-environment-variable in set-paths.
>
> This is also quite tricky, because the "libc" input passed to set-paths
> must not be removed from C_INCLUDE_PATH in (gnu packages commencement)
> for mes packages.

Yeah, fiddling with =E2=80=98set-paths=E2=80=99 sounds like opening a can o=
f worms.

> So, maybe the best option is to patch QEMU directly, as proposed in
> the attached patch. WDYT?

I=E2=80=99m all in favor of that for now.  It=E2=80=99s likely that QEMU is=
 the only
package having problems, as Marius noted (the GHC error sounds like it
could be something different), so I=E2=80=99d say go for the package-specif=
ic
solution for now.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.