From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GNQpCBL4fl85awAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 11:29:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id IP8JBBL4fl/aKQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 11:29:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0B74940538 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57152 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQU6q-0004J2-Hw for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 07:29:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQU6c-0004Iw-QF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 07:29:06 -0400 Received: from ns13.heimat.it ([46.4.214.66]:59810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQU6a-0005Bj-S7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 07:29:06 -0400 Received: from localhost (ip6-localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns13.heimat.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2280F3021B8; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:29:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ns13.heimat.it Received: from ns13.heimat.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns13.heimat.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2AeTopDHpKyC; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bourrache.mug.xelera.it (unknown [93.56.169.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ns13.heimat.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFC853021B5; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from roquette.mug.biscuolo.net (roquette [10.38.2.14]) by bourrache.mug.xelera.it (Postfix) with SMTP id 0ADD17A945E; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 13:28:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: (nullmailer pid 17382 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 08 Oct 2020 11:28:38 -0000 From: Giovanni Biscuolo To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: commit 62035656ca: Add opensmtpd-filter-dkimsign. In-Reply-To: <87wo01dqjz.fsf@nckx> Organization: Xelera.eu References: <87sgbxdgfx.fsf@roquette.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87wo01dqjz.fsf@nckx> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 13:28:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9flgdnd.fsf@roquette.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=46.4.214.66; envelope-from=g@xelera.eu; helo=ns13.heimat.it X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/08 07:29:01 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.11 X-TUID: VjrzpWyBD5bp --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tobias, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > Hi Gio', > > Somehow I missed this message. Sorry about that. Non prob! > Giovanni Biscuolo =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A [...] >> I don't know if there is a policy in cases like this: should we >> revert that commit and split in two commits? > > Nope. It shouldn't happen, of course, but IMO once it's done it's > done (assuming it didn't break Nix, of course). OK understood, thank you for your feedback. Ciao, Gio' [...] =2D-=20 Giovanni Biscuolo Xelera IT Infrastructures --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJABAEBCgAqFiEERcxjuFJYydVfNLI5030Op87MORIFAl9+9+YMHGdAeGVsZXJh LmV1AAoJENN9DqfOzDkS0GMP/Ry64qJpvnYtiKiHAix8T8F18NcTFvZVlJRPHHrY xh10bX24mgllWSawFMnBFjRsXqRMB5RTW1W6AjZyhBWyjSFgjzcSYOHG5yQYPPCK frzBt7zOLR38pLUHlgOp5hJVxvHiQEnkZCqdz+VoXWt5ZkZiOVkjV3fUkHb/bgpt zz6kocFyGafHAVnZN1VwfDqhGI/qC+jiBcy2quPCCDvnGVWGixzqQZ3jnptdoh2V YdZFoQJEcaRZLpCOMrmGI8SHlbDj3s7vJeDOk6RECopcOaGcVrYbKL6FjnqOvcWm TVIMVuIhD7BTozuCcIl+aJ9Hdp5NyL074V05i77n8DvCPT27J94tU/DumqjDaoFn GLM9sxaoWzAfemtIsY4ZpqfJ9cvbJH1rUKYT+6N3BxMXD1moJ5KbVGDFXr/RwdX4 rLG7w7/SbUo4uUYZxWyyq7y59zK0DcxiweqzpeZ88Skp4h3Np4BdBgu6Q06b9Fq5 fkFaxF+6Mi+3UbTTTQUGxMJyNmqv0mMCrtYezjFQIaDT2KdG2Ki/rM/ZSIMdP2dP T7Vg5CUkikBasRT3bSU0XuMsGSygxyJZT0aPYvFwcngSOLCMtWJ+fGz2Gsba8OHp dXUWpGYx3kInzl6oOFtx/JStA7PiU+3DYHkqu4TmdzB1AJDcKBGL4SvKEN9wtwUr fcad =CtRS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--