From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 9gc/CBpTm1/ZFwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 23:41:14 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id AGHDAxpTm18rSQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 23:41:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C0B79400D3 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 23:41:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55142 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYHXb-0005Fv-Bx for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 19:41:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYHXS-0005Fb-Gj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 19:41:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYHXS-00026s-7l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 19:41:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYHXS-0001IW-65 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 19:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#44039] [PATCH] gnu: Add slade. Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 23:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44039 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: James Smith Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , James Smith , 44039@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44039-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44039.16040148054894 (code B ref 44039); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 23:41:02 +0000 Received: (at 44039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2020 23:40:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55456 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYHWW-0001Gr-SF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 19:40:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33204) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYHWT-0001GG-PO for 44039@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 19:40:02 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50154) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYHWO-0001pE-E8; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 19:39:56 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=50630 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kYHWN-00052L-Tk; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 19:39:56 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20201016184333.1445-1-jsubuntuxp@disroot.org> <87zh4lanh9.fsf@nckx> <87y2jq1jvc.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 00:39:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: (James Smith's message of "Thu, 29 Oct 2020 02:49:58 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <87v9esy52t.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.51 X-TUID: 7dpfIWz5XGNf Hi, James Smith skribis: > I have a couple of questions since I'm new to this sort of thing: > 1. Do I need to rebase first? > 2. If I do, are there any final changes needed? Like I wrote, it seems that v2 mostly fits the bill. The only potential issue as I see it is the new =E2=80=98reset-slade.pk3-timestamps=E2=80=99 p= hase: I don=E2=80=99t see what effect it has, like I wrote, so I wonder if it=E2=80=99s necessary. Tobias, WDYT? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.