From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id aCN+GSGNnV9ZbAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:13:21 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 4BqpFSGNnV8aKwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:13:21 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBDF8940416 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49540 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYtVG-0007tQ-9t for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:13:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYtV0-0007sb-H7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:13:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51054) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYtV0-0004T6-2O for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:13:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYtUz-0003PF-T5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:13:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#44208] [PATCH 1/3] gnu: netcdf: Update to 4.7.4. Resent-From: Christopher Baines Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44208 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 44208-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44208-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D44208.160416076613066 (code D ref 44208); Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:13:01 +0000 Received: (at 44208-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Oct 2020 16:12:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34367 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYtUk-0003Og-3E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:12:46 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:41012) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYtUf-0003OO-AI for 44208-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:12:44 -0400 Received: from localhost (188.28.126.167.threembb.co.uk [188.28.126.167]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D2EB27BBF2; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:12:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from capella (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d5d980b8; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:12:37 +0000 (UTC) References: <87lffua9ct.fsf@cbaines.net> <20201025103508.6845-1-mail@cbaines.net> <87mu09b6np.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfftynsc.fsf@cbaines.net> <87h7qe65sc.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: <87h7qe65sc.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:12:34 +0000 Message-ID: <87v9eqxtl9.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.11 X-TUID: hyZgGIH4tIuD --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Christopher Baines skribis: > >> I'd always start at Patchwork, so https://patchwork.cbaines.net/ . You >> might be able to spot it in the list, but you can also search by >> clicking on "Show patches with" in the top left [1]. >> >> 1: https://patchwork.cbaines.net/project/guix-patches/list/?series=3D&su= bmitter=3D&state=3D&q=3D44208&archive=3D&delegate=3D > > OK, this one is now empty, but I guess that=E2=80=99s expected. > > Of the 5 =E2=80=9Cchecks=E2=80=9D that appear on each page, =E2=80=98cbai= nes/applying patch=E2=80=99 is > really just about applying the patch to =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99, right? = And > =E2=80=98cbaines/submitting builds=E2=80=99 is about actually building th= ings? Yeah, the applying patch check reflects something about Git's success at applying the patch, which happens in the Laminar job which is linked to. Sometimes the check will fail, but a branch is still created, and sometimes it'll fail and no branch will be created. Applying patches is a hard problem. As for the submitting builds check, that's reported by the script that submits the builds to the coordinator instance being used. So yes, it'll appear when the builds are submitted, and hopefully it doesn't take too long for the builds to happen. > It=E2=80=99s surprising because when you go the comparison page, sometime= s you > can see that builds are scheduled, so we don=E2=80=99t yet whether it has > succeeded. But my understanding is that the Patchwork UI will only > display whether a build has been submitted, not whether it has > succeeded, correct? Indeed. It's possible to feed information about the build results back in to Patchwork, but that'll require polling/watching the build results as they're fed back to the Guix Data Service, I'm also not sure how flexible Patchwork checks are. > We need a hands-on session. :-) Yeah, next on my list of things is to actually send an email out about the recent changes, but I can hopefully do more with this patch review stuff over the next month or two. My innovation for today is including some indication of build statuses on the package derivation comparision page, and excitingly builds are starting to happen for patches that I'm looking at (like [1] and [2]). 1: https://data.guix-patches.cbaines.net/compare/package-derivations?base_c= ommit=3Dc15509682f931f8afbe2d71ccdef278454c53774&target_commit=3Dd9a510a2b9= 72b90f8efed9172608f8e0d22768d1&locale=3Den_US.UTF-8 2: https://data.guix-patches.cbaines.net/compare/package-derivations?base_c= ommit=3D1c6d98533153bc8e0e36236e7fbcf1eb5e178d26&target_commit=3D8335d68660= ce8813b6bbf515e40ed01cae4e7fb7&locale=3Den_US.UTF-8 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl+djPJfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9Xc3uw/8CW/qNrAIBG1KOFLy9TT+27hM2FjXUgm3 4s514y73m0PVvZvCLEWT5S6wv/d4cEbYN+U40RgnqjZqAq9qHmcFL6NP/lPOUiZ7 vB19FswY/Y4vbVBRL2/dZwj7hMR7bUSPS2qiLr1rZvifiJETMYQayPZX2b6Cd9od bX5WVHiFBOfR8DM68egvGIBbLrva1EX6HIqF7ot7Wl1UfhaBXQ+Q+TT4SExElrhk 1m/njSgPosOYzhubDyuR5fi6pIQbDnlyN6NUHwkhU7w+0xNM1A1XNbj5iQNqtIhd SigKKo8ku+miI884juhfQq89gNarqswaHTmBJ8nde2rdsWevNJotCSstzuS1rUGr YoIEX6Oyq1B25a4m/OhzLWc6PBG8PwCTvNfZheK8Aa85L3osnaiao+IOMXsp0fHd cPUKfrDAuAFoih3sIU7TUvAhfi/zsEoA7OvYQsc9FoXHOsKjB0TWJbOXelWr+Pkp zPmkS/TyXlrJlr9nuqLKkzyBkMA+OhctEQ2niKup6uPiuSIEBRUvjlqe0v3adxKQ h9bSZUp6IESeikFfQSvFABVJyM+cmAyHRwUFooh71JcQUqubKUyUP14jm6lS/O7b tU0xUMbiycWiTLZc1x3tt5/0osDVdrebqXYQPp4YqNCo+BypUg0QYLcLQFygbS5t TdhRdmzFL/w= =CxgB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--