From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id yFPMJixnN2DGRgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:00:28 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id kL3GIixnN2DjWwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:00:28 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC1DF14A21 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:00:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59852 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFCVT-0003BF-Nx for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 04:00:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFCV8-000367-Ut for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 04:00:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53295) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFCV8-0005dR-Iz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 04:00:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFCV8-0000t7-HJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 04:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46740] [PATCH] gnu: make-nsis: Fix build Resent-From: Christopher Baines Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46740 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Carl Dong Cc: 46740@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46740-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46740.16142435683346 (code B ref 46740); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:00:02 +0000 Received: (at 46740) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2021 08:59:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36608 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFCUa-0000ru-IP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 03:59:28 -0500 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:45544) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFCUY-0000rl-7e for 46740@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 03:59:26 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:68c1:0:8ac0:b4c7:f5c8:7caa]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBF2C27BC4A; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:59:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from capella (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 752a8389; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:59:23 +0000 (UTC) References: <20210224030050.457744-1-contact@carldong.me> <87ft1lluu4.fsf@cbaines.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.14; emacs 27.1 From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:59:23 +0000 Message-ID: <87v9agjzf8.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.47 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: BC1DF14A21 X-Spam-Score: -4.47 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: ygNO7YTZZOzu --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Carl Dong writes: > Been a while since I last submitted a patch, so want to make sure I > get this right :-) Thanks for your help! > > Does this look alright? Yep, that looks fine. There's a couple of changes that look a bit redundant, the rearranging of a comment and the description string, but that's not a problem. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmA3ZutfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XdJQA//cIPuoL3FcFtxCTU+NDwtG1WaiqtErLfg LnCvsQ1yq+OsXPuQrGEx6XetbzJhse9ZPhfG0iVfM3QUcljNVKxu3Vh+7qbiudBn QKucb4lh1zz1reGoFsxiesRjgyIdazORl3OeZrJac88MGTIOFSOU9QJned93i2Rf oZ68XHdyIsOQOJnvcjJ+p7mItwVxvVZrDWMLi486Qf3uEqbKuNntZfmk3hD/RcDt 8eEAH0PH9gSsiYDQoMQ8LbnTfgFpLfJPF9BAr3MmqDX9Ju0PgnUvj+EY47a1x3U1 k5lFHUNvOKNRt1BZF4RpJPQsJOrvVm+X5f7rKa/Se8WGWphyKBF1qosAv1DsspiP 69UOG1ZOcExH74MHkYTSaaMD36cSIj3EK1KOyxp86bbhJUOusMWbJXNeUbAHZrsg eQ4XLbuDZUOYnSV8y2AY4Mx/f1blPGsy+nxoib2PPOiCySCp2DtDXFMPqRpb9sw1 6SrcyV5xPUDDApBdidvEj55iDdLPLt598Qrc3U3GrxSgtVJJEu+P79iJY7ikcrkf JB5tl3VT19zaj/2EHryTAVcrYxF9ZVkStoU6uqtYErrbaoOespIgxp9AMNhA1trS It2xYQqx+2f2+DGF1xBGul+fhpNWVi29ujmQodd8cyh1sAC/x9FuqprW6hXWYX5l EqqOwXJYfQY= =k4JI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--