[bug#65350] Request for merging "qt-updates" branch

[bug#65350] Request for merging "qt-updates" branch

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hello,

It's all in the title :-).

I believe the branch is ready, though we'll want to look at the QA stats
after it's done building it, just to make sure.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

[bug#65350] Request for merging "qt-updates" branch

[宋文武 via Guix-patches via]

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> It's all in the title :-).
>
> I believe the branch is ready, though we'll want to look at the QA stats
> after it's done building it, just to make sure.

There are some failures on CI with "cannot build missing derivation
...", eg:  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1830064/details

No idea how to handle that.


Also I think the kde-updates branch is ready to be merged too, which
should we merge first?

Thanks.

[bug#65350] Request for merging "qt-updates" branch

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hi,

宋文武 <iyzsong@envs.net> writes:

> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It's all in the title :-).
>>
>> I believe the branch is ready, though we'll want to look at the QA stats
>> after it's done building it, just to make sure.
>
> There are some failures on CI with "cannot build missing derivation
> ...", eg:  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1830064/details

Yeah, these are really annoying.  I researched a bit past effort trying
to understand what's going on, and it seems to be related to baking NARs
and the connection timing out when it's too long, or similar.  The
corresponding bug report is https://issues.guix.gnu.org/54447, and some
debugging effort was documented in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50040.

[...]

> Also I think the kde-updates branch is ready to be merged too, which
> should we merge first?

No matter how we merge, the number of rebuilds will be the same, so I
suggest you go ahead.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

[bug#65350] Request for merging "qt-updates" branch

[宋文武]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 625 bytes --]

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:

> [...]
>
>> Also I think the kde-updates branch is ready to be merged too, which
>> should we merge first?
>
> No matter how we merge, the number of rebuilds will be the same, so I
> suggest you go ahead.

Done!


> I forgot to mention, if you don't have that already and would like to
> have a user TLS certificate giving you admin powers to restart builds or
> configure branches on Berlin, I can generate one.

Yes, that would be great!  (I sent an email to guix-sysadmin asked for
it some time ago)

I think you can sent it encrypted via my GPG key on savannah, TIA!

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 519 bytes --]

[bug#65350] Request for merging "qt-updates" branch

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hi again,

宋文武 <iyzsong@envs.net> writes:

> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It's all in the title :-).
>>
>> I believe the branch is ready, though we'll want to look at the QA stats
>> after it's done building it, just to make sure.
>
> There are some failures on CI with "cannot build missing derivation
> ...", eg:  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1830064/details

I forgot to mention, if you don't have that already and would like to
have a user TLS certificate giving you admin powers to restart builds or
configure branches on Berlin, I can generate one.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim