From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id KMwQCngN42WcDgEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 02 Mar 2024 12:28:56 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id KMwQCngN42WcDgEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 02 Mar 2024 12:28:56 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=zancanaro.id.au header.s=k1 header.b=jVKlbDGC; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=zancanaro.id.au (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1709378936; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=Ad9GEB8pcHqA0uQUv+yFa2j5i4b1J8ZKD5koIaGL3YE=; b=hZN47TIOe3/LmFbHpD+6bMFM9D/17KdsnSJTp5geQY2y5OoojhR3jxq970EgcjX3eF67qz xVprd51bY8mTMCgy18hBxaH49O1gYK1DS95BHNzo2P9qk+9+m+pdhilDRWyPZjs0nOgTUv VUGHotNHHiEgvvk50GhOGVHxPC/jStymWbqHN86RUlXjQyZ3jJnaOkXFHjnwzv2Jy2kOQD QsOiVJv9x3RzKAtYIfm7twXni4j8SzO1gIxnbnPRT5VVP3koqUBqBQDbsq3zMgl9l22o2s 7dwAjxHXSC5HS4gNNFZh2EiW6ndj+tEVdOT3fv6vsJSMBg35wYumLTC+wnEfNg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=zancanaro.id.au header.s=k1 header.b=jVKlbDGC; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=zancanaro.id.au (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1709378936; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=pB7A9a4sLqQxzsCXLUA/FCdku/VzNjtyk4l/dOvpPXKD6R6eHHwYorR0LjRtniGj8dJ8qD 5NzT/dr/V+YJF1jKmpeREo6GoPVr/MfFaPL41pDfR6fhQj2PPkdrR5ilolakwIgScz/EDb P210y2tsQ3WAQ51zUf+ez2ioyz/e0sM0rn4x4ilCiXbnoTStV5QxwcPFwIoRpUMK41UUhJ XXXMWW4wzsmHUZqlpwTcY2vEy7wpkxc+0JAfX5lYtTBBsFGG3TY23AKDzSX0Xai5h5cExA sZtUctcTdaojqZGnkzxWH/V7ecfLgUyShKSUxU0RyrxHLz1Af9Wp38TTqJBDVQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D49827842 for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2024 12:28:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgNXf-00017Z-RC; Sat, 02 Mar 2024 06:28:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgNXd-00017O-Sn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2024 06:28:34 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgNXd-0007iM-Ip for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2024 06:28:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgNY5-0002Zb-Js for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2024 06:29:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#69272] [PATCH v2 4/4] gnu: Add prosody-vcard-muc. Resent-From: Carlo Zancanaro Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2024 11:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69272 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Liliana Marie Prikler Cc: 69272@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69272-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69272.17093789129843 (code B ref 69272); Sat, 02 Mar 2024 11:29:01 +0000 Received: (at 69272) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2024 11:28:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38124 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgNXc-0002Yg-0f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2024 06:28:32 -0500 Received: from voltorb.zancanaro.id.au ([45.77.50.64]:46928) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgNXV-0002YK-VE for 69272@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2024 06:28:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; bh=Ad9GEB8pcHqA0uQ Uv+yFa2j5i4b1J8ZKD5koIaGL3YE=; h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject: cc:to:from; d=zancanaro.id.au; b=jVKlbDGC/Zjn3muP6YQAMJx63jkZke5fWufzv /hl+SKdPzdqWryrzypOzw4kQ5k4/0BNHNBeRKtlupCx4K6nwXyaeVwjz2IXGlIm7Xxj+uN vVIlFsiS9sdDrn2YB5THjQk7cSR9OdzmH9ou1n6DLAZIwGbLtOlnLLkLuGD1vNPA= Received: by voltorb.zancanaro.id.au (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1ee18ada (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 2 Mar 2024 11:27:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Carlo Zancanaro In-Reply-To: (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Sat, 02 Mar 2024 07:42:58 +0100") References: Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2024 22:27:49 +1100 Message-ID: <87v864j2kq.fsf@zancanaro.id.au> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 2.73 X-Spam-Score: 2.73 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0D49827842 X-TUID: F3hwrm6tHQxy Hi Liliana, On Sat, Mar 02 2024, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Do the hashes on prosody change that quickly? Nope! This is using a mercurial checkout, so the hashes shouldn't change at all. I just made a mistake in my commits. Patch 3/4 in v2 updates the changeset and revision, but not the expected hash. I'm not sure how I messed this up, given patch 3/4 in v1 updated the hash. The actual hash that you got is the same as my v1 patch: 1nvka8s3zqs97jqsknhp2q956rrdga1qaxa1y3i0h8zx3g9vgdch I'll send through a v3 today. Carlo P.S. Apologies that you'll get this message twice. I forgot to Cc the bug tracer on the first attempt.