From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6OJaETR15GYoGgAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:24:04 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6OJaETR15GYoGgAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 19:24:04 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=gXpVpQ0Q; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=nwqZbxCl; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict), DKIM not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1726248244; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=gdRYPyOLDLsCgECymdbDXtgG6ppxJ4o6gRZGtIyjZoI=; b=o/+04Upj/V4TZFZ8may5fuOven2wCRl5oBf6MbxL9YNr25TLiWqicl6INf1G3B8GLnba7A Vfk50pPEV3jpqz+3wyGZPPtjUf6gDu36/tmravWXQMYt0ElAt5F3Y+XS6w5wGGmWotyiZx d/ge+tB0moHqKuDs/vJnkNIugRM1H+X+0VyCZgBLRI77j5z2CpO4kJwkxIuRlXR6MTJe/4 XDc2gydfHFXYDecCBDNqPxU9RbpKZM8kkfSW2NSIkudw9Fz2DLvhkNIPXh6/5p3cJtVoFZ fH0gaLhz0GY6DjZT3xR8PR63UJhDs4ohu5dA5yjj613MC0hkBuwG1WxDXb1w5A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1726248244; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=K+BaizOphVyCth6+5LDEYlizER8yyzNdVTfNRaEBvIy/NL7lqpjDjAwOp1Su3KEZc96UEo d3EHTpjvz7SxzBQwxJMPXBHtxc616OWFaLJB7yfrpQX7AcdbbYJP4dDWTUmBk3j6T52r0W tyukNBv+yi6GeFKXocgrAxbE3NLj+Jg7B6IkOVr+5GDbJGrZm9wUmYhsxP2sC40GvpoZX7 J8helptzyjNX4rHH8hVioMVknpuW91cKD8g2jiOvreVp5JFCrGe4l2ldWStZ7jYaz4QrZj F2HOBqiqd5GqybC8WinM+YSPlSZMpTbmrBl1X84Hnm4J0H3K513T/BVQ9N4TrA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=gXpVpQ0Q; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=nwqZbxCl; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict), DKIM not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE725664ED for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 19:24:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1spA1V-0004bP-IX; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:23:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1spA1R-0004Ys-J7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:23:54 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1spA1R-0005Gx-6i for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:23:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=gdRYPyOLDLsCgECymdbDXtgG6ppxJ4o6gRZGtIyjZoI=; b=gXpVpQ0QKkBEzfvb2KAuyO/jPD3j4121cVe4Xoy0m7jjfeokF+WclyMTt/amtpwSQmrZQk/zLIWc6coa+9yBx65stYBu4hMfoUB3/lLEieJ2wOGawU5m7VFWkpruLOb1rjo+tTWL65D4uPKS0PWQavZ+XqS2w0v8otHhPvjaWkiSBE/1OFDqrh1ziJVzYUyZBscTMW43Ha/AL6a9+IflOzz9xsqGZOiMN0cE8I8haIqlgO32RgCD6KS3+A9+qT6FquwiVnT2nNJreqVVsAaiNigZXS6Wp1ga/cYKJ391AJW+IxyelLhkvPLAvadgJ2qsvD/3hLOXSYI/mqpE7I3zXg==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1spA1a-0004kv-HB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73210] [PATCH] gnu: smalltalk: Fix tests. Resent-From: Guillaume Le Vaillant Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73210 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Greg Hogan Cc: 73210@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73210-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73210.172624820318211 (code B ref 73210); Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:24:02 +0000 Received: (at 73210) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2024 17:23:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44197 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1spA0w-0004jf-K3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:23:22 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:49191) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1spA0t-0004jJ-Vi for 73210@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:23:21 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6648D240027 for <73210@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 19:23:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1726248183; bh=gdRYPyOLDLsCgECymdbDXtgG6ppxJ4o6gRZGtIyjZoI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=nwqZbxClhCty21qaJ+J8Q9rYby34nGU22y9LufiPH8mC3itU1mvJOGsA44exazfoY H42uj0LfdRrbw0/I0lj/cEjdbCwFfg8Ww+LptwVatIJyyoiVVuZrfKOzQuakYYuRe7 0R88h1HUwD1EhQLU0vodiPeSEpezUQJ2e8Iu76o1bS8jGV3gwT3wN8JqzIMGe9qSLx H4EAuKOKqUhv3T20yH+ATmttP7b3GyaUg4XITYElVtZ03gjBdNnAvAzW+KJRFj4gzH KfeY5DDTY8OLpOKkW73LUpz3Eb/dX0DQXxnCbdveq0E6+lKOV9sEeM2BRCv2ByGAui YY9Dky3/2gCQw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4X51NQ3cZ5z6tmv; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 19:23:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Guillaume Le Vaillant In-Reply-To: (Greg Hogan's message of "Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:18:29 -0400") References: <87zfoban7l.fsf@kitej> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:23:00 +0000 Message-ID: <87v7yza2ob.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -12.23 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: CE725664ED X-Spam-Score: -12.23 X-TUID: GZ6UtPdf6IG5 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greg Hogan skribis: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 5:59=E2=80=AFAM Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: >> >> Hi. >> I tried your patch, but some tests are still failing for me. >> More specifically, the "ANSI compliancy tests" are all failing with the >> same error: >> >> [...] >> >> Does the build work for you every time? >> What architecture are you using? I'm on x86-64 Guix system. > > I have built the package two more times without errors (though the > output is non-deterministic). The only error I have seen was the I18N > test failure before adding this locales patch. > > My system is x86-64 on a foreign distro. Given that the patch is correct (adding a missing input), I applied it as 22a34ea792ef0df15fd30d46f557b572c61d5404. The build farm built it fine for i686, but on x86-64 it got the same error as me (https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5765437/details). A strange thing is that if I keep the files of the failed build (with "guix build -K") and then run the tests by hand, they all succeed. I wonder where the difference with what you get could come from... What CPU does your machine have? And how much RAM? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCZuR09A8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j/sPwD8DeW179LKy/0CmIm6Gm4EWwVJXsnvpDUkgryV Nkb8d6gA/jIlUIL7Z69f0Zq2eqZqIRTQUMEHXxC5ud/kYEL/xGPa =93I+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--