From: Cayetano Santos <csantosb@inventati.org>
To: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@protonmail.com>
Cc: "Felix Lechner via \"Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution.\"" <guix-devel@gnu.org>,
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>,
Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>,
Suhail Singh <suhailsingh247@gmail.com>,
Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com>
Subject: Re: On the quest for a new release model
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 19:00:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v7vm5elg.fsf@inventati.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a5cz6o31.fsf@protonmail.com> (John Kehayias's message of "Sat, 14 Dec 2024 01:38:38 +0000")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 836 bytes --]
>sam. 14 déc. 2024 at 01:38, John Kehayias <john.kehayias@protonmail.com> wrote:
> Is this something we agree on? I think being clear what Guix is (in terms of "releases"),
> and what we want it to be, is essential first.
Thanks for the summary on current situation. I agree with you, and have
nothing against. But I have a doubt.
In "22.8.3 Version Numbers", we state that "Occasionally, we package
snapshots of upstream’s version control system (VCS) instead of formal
releases. This should remain exceptional, because it is up to upstream
developers to clarify what the stable release is"
So, what exactly is a packager of guix expected to package, from guix
point of view ?
--
Cayetano Santos
GnuPG Key: https://meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp
FingerPrint: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5C DF4D F6BF 6682
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-14 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-09 12:19 Discussion notes on releases and branches Andreas Enge
2023-02-12 21:13 ` Moving forward with teams and feature branches (was: Discussion notes on releases and branches) Josselin Poiret
2023-02-12 21:34 ` Andreas Enge
2023-02-13 9:32 ` Time for RFC? (was Re: Moving forward with teams and feature branches (was: Discussion notes on releases and branches)) zimoun
2023-02-13 14:04 ` bug#61475: Staging branch (was: Moving forward with teams and feature branches) Andreas Enge
2023-05-10 2:55 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-13 14:07 ` Moving forward with teams and feature branches (was: Discussion notes on releases and branches) Andreas Enge
2023-02-14 19:12 ` Leo Famulari
2023-02-13 9:22 ` Release (was " Simon Tournier
2023-02-14 10:14 ` Rust team branch " Efraim Flashner
2023-02-14 16:36 ` Rust team branch Andreas Enge
2023-02-14 20:07 ` Efraim Flashner
2023-02-16 10:56 ` Andreas Enge
2023-02-14 16:36 ` Rust team branch (was Re: Discussion notes on releases and branches) Katherine Cox-Buday
2023-02-14 20:08 ` Efraim Flashner
2023-02-15 17:49 ` Katherine Cox-Buday
2023-03-17 15:24 ` Discussion notes on releases and branches Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-03-18 17:42 ` Leo Famulari
2024-12-13 8:37 ` On the quest for a new release model (was: Discussion notes on releases and branches) Cayetano Santos
2024-12-13 12:03 ` On the quest for a new release model Ricardo Wurmus
2024-12-13 13:01 ` Suhail Singh
2024-12-13 15:21 ` Greg Hogan
2024-12-13 15:52 ` Suhail Singh
2024-12-13 16:05 ` Suhail Singh
2024-12-13 16:28 ` Cayetano Santos
2024-12-13 17:21 ` Suhail Singh
2024-12-13 20:34 ` Cayetano Santos
2024-12-13 22:13 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2024-12-13 22:27 ` Suhail Singh
2024-12-13 23:08 ` Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2024-12-14 1:38 ` John Kehayias via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2024-12-14 17:18 ` kiasoc5
2024-12-14 18:00 ` Cayetano Santos [this message]
2024-12-14 20:53 ` Attila Lendvai
2024-12-13 16:04 ` Simon Josefsson via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2024-12-13 17:47 ` Suhail Singh
2024-12-13 20:14 ` Tomas Volf
2024-12-13 22:13 ` Suhail Singh
2024-12-14 8:59 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2024-12-14 14:23 ` Suhail Singh
2024-12-14 12:26 ` Tomas Volf
2024-12-14 14:49 ` Suhail Singh
2024-12-14 8:53 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2024-12-14 17:21 ` Splitting up Guix channel (was: On the quest for a new release model) Suhail Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v7vm5elg.fsf@inventati.org \
--to=csantosb@inventati.org \
--cc=code@greghogan.com \
--cc=felix.lechner@lease-up.com \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=john.kehayias@protonmail.com \
--cc=rekado@elephly.net \
--cc=suhailsingh247@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.