From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id mIykE1KAemfAfwEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 12:51:30 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id mIykE1KAemfAfwEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 13:51:30 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=ieyZ04Oy; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=xn--no-cja.eu header.s=ds202402 header.b="C kU3AxU"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1736081490; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=NSJDDCNHoxHemdlq5/36moElLv9Qmk8ow78mQXhyx58=; b=CdtLumSUlRGLlkLKpvkg0ujdLtZmygmRBtdlL06XYKWgo/lmDmlcJVAcW5RuHDCap+LKzm cNjJpDZdJADuVHa3LEJDgQQVASG5zB/CEq7CK3L/KGwNYFO6QNSWZqDN3wSKU9Ih6oANzm KKZY03bFc6tX21l22yf/Ue7wMiXJlAi2QijbszVbNxMFEcwmbe7HR/w+uQLA2zSQu/YQs5 DVOkHFj5KiDDo8JTHRQ0LzDSM54NRB1Q77gRFZe0cV478+rzG5Gn2fO2y/VokUcVEclsS4 8KJXVoLWOafgtDIhmYM0fLd+F9v5cc+aK9EENUj5s4jcnkaS4rmYjZjJeQNmJQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=ieyZ04Oy; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=xn--no-cja.eu header.s=ds202402 header.b="C kU3AxU"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1736081490; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=XwHGmR0s3+Tf+TSBMdGRuZqOUEGVi2hcKE7PwZ1TbeDqFxh02/wJAdSe/dp7FCSCS3lCzd Z3JGrwxN49NYIr8Bb0XVRUnjkLZu/YTCx80h+rHVuEOF/Wk7pyjOPazuwTX2B9zrkv4AFo FgcMNPua/a+TPUAgvsWnfzBeTkfzAammUd12Jl2ci7oY2CrfByZLzoNm9dSD30Et0urSha ACH5oHEAEi95MKntPTId3HKTTh5744VyE1USkqIk2E454sReL1/KG9JSjRO2X6woPECsKG sxM2qyrN/IfpuumNgNPKaBID2r5gcDSBrC6zqdV6NQgLrrb2fi+QeYOhs+m2Bg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C31719157A for ; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 13:51:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tUQ5x-0006pV-Af; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 07:51:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tUQ5v-0006pH-1P for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 07:51:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tUQ5u-0001sb-PT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 07:51:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=NSJDDCNHoxHemdlq5/36moElLv9Qmk8ow78mQXhyx58=; b=ieyZ04OyXsqHedCFZcTzT2k7V0G+6FOCakFDEsPGsR/hq0BtuztdMijOoo+b2PmTPxotc9/omqe/7sxaLADUIQxkyIEq4tl1Sk0bFc2T1sBdTPR89Sa09g1re36s5z2enEuDUinbDsYCZunWxAvxFBPFaHgtoWoueHO5Neture4RutVj/GX4Pcr4uPy1Q6BegORdtCXsJKkbLPFs+lXCTfXAEOdbF5MF6Lv62LnDJzJJRxaku9KVA1LhaDrusFsuRV8sDrWWvlFF31DzrQEctapC0xloNIlELGJG9W4Jq8uYwPnc2N9NgBnNDjSeHrBzx5fExTNaJIjptLW1zynJTQ==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tUQ5u-00015J-KB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 07:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#74736] [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process. Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 12:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74736 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 74736@debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier Received: via spool by 74736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74736.17360814414130 (code B ref 74736); Sun, 05 Jan 2025 12:51:02 +0000 Received: (at 74736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2025 12:50:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60303 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tUQ5Z-00014X-85 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 07:50:41 -0500 Received: from smtp.domeneshop.no ([2a01:5b40:0:3006::1]:56794) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tUQ5V-000146-Or for 74736@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 07:50:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xn--no-cja.eu; s=ds202402; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:From: Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post: List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NSJDDCNHoxHemdlq5/36moElLv9Qmk8ow78mQXhyx58=; b=C kU3AxU5aG1H52ZYEak79UP5IvGBFNpFjY14mZqHMLq7TghCM1EpNxQTyrSuKz3AhtfTojE/mznL3l V4ZfhXBXcBjAduPI/MGItRIXVgMy0Bx67TGtNZ0iyS7DYjIGp67qizb7zw3hiSbLgst2L5FOiY8Vo zlqFrWawdQrKQ9zF3CPAwQATMGyVLSlB0OzhuGFkVoEjOVkNUNo65z/jHjJQe8cNAOvUQYFGXEkei 8epsQnR/bK8y9Q+XcPHjC+U1sybTYfmedb4sX2GSxuou7GCRLQvlNxftsq+wbzDjk3aR8WY1ZO9Oe fTebn1XgPMZHpuwTciczbnVFoPPB7N+Ag==; Received: from smtp by smtp.domeneshop.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) id 1tUQ5P-005q7a-D1; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 13:50:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87ttaeqyje.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ikraea0f.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87wmfifii5.fsf@xn--no-cja.eu> <87seq5tou6.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <875xn14c21.fsf@xn--no-cja.eu> <87ttaeqyje.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 13:51:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87v7utxw2a.fsf@xn--no-cja.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez X-ACL-Warn: , =?utf-8?q?No=C3=A9_Lopez_via_Guix-patches?= From: =?utf-8?q?No=C3=A9_Lopez_via_Guix-patches?= via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.60 X-Spam-Score: -6.60 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: C31719157A X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: B/1ionfgZTSV >> Half of the committers is 25 people (based on .guix-authorizations), and >> a quarter of the team members is 10. Personnally, I have trouble >> imagining that this amount of people will come to send a mail to the >> RFC. > > So are you saying you=E2=80=99d want no quorum at all? (Your revision st= ill > reads =E2=80=9C50% committers=E2=80=9D.) To take a realistic example, say I make an RFC for P2P substitute distribution with GNUNet/ERIS, this is a big change that requires an RFC but I have trouble imagining that ten people in the team members are interested in that. Teams are specialized after all, if I add myself to the games team it doesn=E2=80=99t mean I care about RFCs for what would be the core team. That said I trust your experience to find a quorum that works and if you think ten is realistic then go for it. >> Lastly, do we want to move the RFCs to a separate git repository? > > I think so. I=E2=80=99ll ask for it on Savannah. > Great! Have a nice day, No=C3=A9