From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Thompson Subject: Re: Reproducible profiles Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 16:51:35 -0400 Message-ID: <87twvb7wrs.fsf@fsf.org> References: <87pp62iqmn.fsf@fsf.org> <87egmgu609.fsf@gnu.org> <87zj5380v4.fsf@fsf.org> <877fs7j6oh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46343) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yu5XG-0002wW-R4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2015 16:51:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yu5XG-0002zG-1G for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2015 16:51:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877fs7j6oh.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > (FWIW I=E2=80=99m not fond of the `(,gcc-toolchain "debug") notation that= we > also use in packages, but it has the advantage of being concise.) Do you have plans to introduce a better notation? G-exps? --=20 David Thompson GPG Key: 0FF1D807