From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: Add guile-config Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:27:01 -0800 Message-ID: <87twl8qwvu.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <87h9haw654.fsf@gmail.com> <87y4alsqlt.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87wpq5hwiv.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35584) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVlH6-0006Lt-7L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:27:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVlH5-0005ps-D6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:27:04 -0500 Received: from dustycloud.org ([2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:feae:cb51]:33704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVlH5-0005pI-69 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:27:03 -0500 In-reply-to: <87wpq5hwiv.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" Alex Sassmannshausen writes: > Hello, > > Christopher Allan Webber writes: > >> Alex Sassmannshausen writes: > > [...] > >> >> I tried building and testing it: >> >> Starting download of /gnu/store/gq2zz95zmmsjkpn7lbwfbna8m4hr56r7-guile= -config-0.1.tar.gz >> From http://alex.pompo.co/software/guile-config-0.1.tar.gz... >> guile-config-0.1.tar.gz 332KiB 100KiB/s 00:03 [##################= ##] 100.0% >> output path `/gnu/store/gq2zz95zmmsjkpn7lbwfbna8m4hr56r7-guile-config-= 0.1.tar.gz' should have sha256 hash `1yk4xmwp4rl9ral02igppfh9dh4l97k2kmgp= kqhy3znjir004v8z', instead has `0fcj2d91z7nhm9k79zkc826l8i06khqvp3d641wik= 9s3hv6qjya2' >> >> So I guess unless I'm being MITM'ed or some other error (I verified >> that's the hash I'm seeing with "guix hash" after a wget), it looks li= ke >> that hash is wrong? >> >> - Chris > > Thanks for testing. The hash was indeed wrong =E2=80=94 which might be > reassuring to you ;-) > > I made some last minute changes yesterday and rolled a new release, > without bumping the version number, which of course changed the hash of > the tarball. I forgot to update the Guix patch. Sorry about that! > > I have updated the hash and added a copyright line (thanks for the > reminder Efraim!), please find an updated patch attached. > > Cheers for the reviews and tests, > > Alex It looks good! I've merged and pushed.