From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: Separate Mailing Lists for Patches vs General Dev Discussion? Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 10:44:48 +0000 Message-ID: <87twfcvftr.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> References: <5796782D.1010104@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38828) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRzr8-0002X8-5x for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 06:44:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRzr5-0006zW-Uu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 06:44:57 -0400 Received: from mithlond.libertad.in-berlin.de ([2001:67c:1400:2490::1]:36823 helo=beleriand.n0.is) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRzr5-0006yb-H0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 06:44:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5796782D.1010104@gmx.net> (Florian Paul Schmidt's message of "Mon, 25 Jul 2016 22:35:57 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Florian Paul Schmidt Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi, Florian Paul Schmidt writes: > Hi, > > I'm following the Guix-Project, even if not contributing much because > of time constraints. The one, very simple to implement, thing that > would make following the project more easy IMHO would be a separate > list for patches. Or maybe the other way around: A separate list for > more general discussion :) > > What do you think? > > Regards, > Flo > I don't know if that's a fix. In my opinion we need a web application which is smart enough to figure out what patches are and append the discussion around it there, but it needs to offer ways to not just display this but to contribute to the discussion in a webbrowser for example. That's of course not our core problem, but it could make it a bit more appealing. I would say we could keep "guix-devel" for patches and discussions around them and create another list for discussion, for example "guix-discuss". No fix, but could help to separate patches and general discussions. What do you all think? -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org