From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: atlas: Use cpupower in description.
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:22:58 +0200
Message-ID: <87twf87t0d.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20160719024520.9121-1-me@tobias.gr>
	<20160719024520.9121-3-me@tobias.gr> <8760s1e42x.fsf@gnu.org>
	<524055e2b85bfd9b153f173afcc0a024@tobias.gr> <87d1m95mh0.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87bn1h4bel.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54978)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@gnu.org>) id 1bT34V-0005GZ-48
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 04:23:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@gnu.org>) id 1bT34Q-0001t7-V1
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 04:23:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87bn1h4bel.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> (ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is's
	message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:59:14 +0000")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hello,

ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:

> Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> writes:
>>
>>> Ludo',
>>>
>>> On 2016-07-19 23:00, ludo@gnu.org wrote:
>>>> Applied, thanks!
>>>
>>> Thanks! I didn't know about @example.
>>>
>>> It seems like some Texinfo syntax is encouraged (like @command), but
>>> not the full set (package descriptions are full of abbreviations,
>>> but no @abbr or @acronym anywhere). Is this by design?
>>
>> Nope it is not by design, the Guile (texinfo ...) modules just don't
>> implement these commands from GNU Texinfo, but should indeed.
>>
>> -- 
>> Mathieu Lirzin
>>
>
> Is there a feature request / bug we could file somewhere on this? I
> don't know what the upstream of Guile texinfo is, but it reads like it
> should be extended.

Guile texinfo is maintained in Guile itself.  You can send a bug report
to <bug-guile@gnu.org>.

Thanks!

-- 
Mathieu Lirzin