From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] gnu: Add rustc-bootstrap.
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 13:55:04 +0000
Message-ID: <87twcsw75z.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
References: <20160928151538.11679-1-david@craven.ch>
	<20160928151538.11679-5-david@craven.ch>
	<871szwebjn.fsf@gnu.org> <87y424zdfi.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<8737kc9s6a.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48561)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1brQCG-0004k8-UG
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 09:55:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1brQCE-00069x-QD
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 09:55:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8737kc9s6a.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com> skribis:
>
>> I don't know what rust-beta-* is, but the rust package I created did not
>> use unversioned files.
>
> Cool!  (Did you submit your own Rust package?)

Yes, search the guix-devel archives for the first rust patches in
beginning of 2016, I went as far as I could at that point and that's how
probably everyone else started off based on that work.

>> There are versioned files, but afaik not in beta. For bootstrap I had
>> this (though it could be that this is already Jelle's work based on my
>> work):
>>
>> (define (archive-name version platform checksum)
>>   (string-append "rust-stage0-" version "-" platform "-" checksum ".tar.bz2"))
>>
>> (define rust-stage0-bootstrap-x86_64-archive
>>   (archive-name "2016-02-17-4d3eebf" "linux-x86_64" "d29b7607d13d64078b6324aec82926fb493f59ba"))
>>
>> (define rust-stage0-bootstrap-x86_64
>>   (origin
>>     (method url-fetch)
>>     (uri
>>      (string-append "https://static.rust-lang.org/stage0-snapshots/" rust-stage0-bootstrap-x86_64-archive))
>>     (sha256 
>>      (base32
>>       "0gk87rknijyirlhw3h34bjxzq98j0v0icp3l8flrxn5pgil8pswd"))))
>>
>> (define rust-stage0-bootstrap-i386-archive
>>   (archive-name "2016-02-17-4d3eebf" "linux-i386" "5f194aa7628c0703f0fd48adc4ec7f3cc64b98c7"))
>>
>> (define rust-stage0-bootstrap-i386
>>   (origin
>>     (method url-fetch)
>>     (uri
>>      (string-append "https://static.rust-lang.org/stage0-snapshots/" rust-stage0-bootstrap-i386-archive))
>>     (sha256
>>      (base32
>>       "16fd2hmli86g1q3fyicdhh2l4aqryzxcij7sk1pljig8dr2m8hg5"))))
>
> That looks good.
>
> I was also going to suggest adding support for i386, which could have
> happened later, but I’m glad you’re providing guidance here!
>
> Ludo’.
>

Do you want me to submit the entire file for context? It's just what
jelle ended up with, I no longer have this online in public searchable
format.
Okay turns out my old repo (moving to gnunet.org slowly) is still
existing and public accessible.
https://gitlab.com/secushare/guixpkgs/blob/master/n0is/packages/rust.scm