From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Display diffs between generations. Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:38:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87twbzuyqm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87eg59izmw.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1kry22u.fsf@gnu.org> <87inuj5r5v.fsf@gnu.org> <87y43ck6dz.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8frq0n5.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgz78v4d.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3ogd5l.fsf@gnu.org> <87r37nxshp.fsf@gnu.org> <8760opeskj.fsf@gnu.org> <87wph43x8x.fsf@gnu.org> <87vawo57sn.fsf@gnu.org> <87funrci3f.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2d3p4bf.fsf@gnu.org> <87wph2zu8z.fsf@gnu.org> <87oa2eqc03.fsf@gnu.org> <20161021164053.2961bd6d@gondolin.arda> <877f8x1o7j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twc08lkc.fsf@gnu.org> <20161026131310.5e1c0994@gondolin.arda> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38791) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzMXB-0004CV-Uc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:38:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzMX6-0001KU-JG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:38:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20161026131310.5e1c0994@gondolin.arda> (Benz Schenk's message of "Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:13:10 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Benz Schenk Cc: guix-devel Benz Schenk skribis: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:01:23 +0200 > Roel Janssen wrote: [...] >> There's only one thing: >> Would it make more sense to stick to the chronology of the generations >> (sorting them before displaying them)? > > IMO it's useful to see the diffs in reverse when before switching > to some previous generation, although you can easily see the changes > no matter how you order the generations, so I don't really have a strong > opinion either way. I=E2=80=99m in favor of not sorting: if the user specifies a reverse order,= it=E2=80=99s their choice. So I think all is good, Roel! Ludo=E2=80=99.