From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: Re: Why don't we have "Guix channels"? Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 23:35:39 -0800 Message-ID: <87twadtv04.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87y3zptva4.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFFjZ-000407-GI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 02:36:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFFjW-0006F4-Eo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 02:36:45 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f66.google.com ([74.125.83.66]:33637) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFFjW-0006Ex-93 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 02:36:42 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f66.google.com with SMTP id 3so1471663pgd.0 for ; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 23:36:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from garuda (c-24-18-189-215.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [24.18.189.215]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b80sm54927895pfe.52.2016.12.08.23.35.40 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Dec 2016 23:35:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87y3zptva4.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Thu, 08 Dec 2016 23:29:39 -0800") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Apologies for the self-reply, but I wanted to point out that it seems "channels" were actually mentioned here as a possible future direction for "guix pull": https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D22629 Still, I'm curious to hear what others think about it. =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAlhKXssACgkQ3UCaFdgi Rp0z2BAAzM01gtGcXVLQXPuXEKbYtez3mmd/VD7CYFJfUJzH3CH0WqM07JaS5kHx 1gzstRtZG3EydtbMJlGWqjtPl+ocMstRsL/Z3zpdpx5TZdE0pcKVrnU5gyWxT+GX p4mjPmhMGf97t+66UJoRBS9JtyvqsK8NC6W1pB+2A7Mfo5lskAgZb2v3x6YrpEzQ SItfrZoiGTNGkmtxUZ16Ih+XoFny+COEv0nVpWPEaGf4zLYzRKETwebyIv4FhNIn W72fEYLmpsSq5SnI/QWKCSl5gdQ9JUGCLoWuAemKrUj8G8REoclqCsKKjFZSlmDY awKCtCsVcvaC+241yuYpH3Q5qP8ESisJ3wMrdxjKQYErNIJ4IWNIpPr6s7C1sfuF MjPkR1wBs3e9uMQ2Zfp7qifWhtU1Dkn2SR/MFOyMF8aLO14bpx5N4Ut6wCB+ITmG 1VlK9NlH46626fDI1Jbg63gRAJkDT/pDB7TiECSQEMPtZnclZ16Q9Gd/uYCUCasu oN03NdQ98sG4oY9e/JXgOvz4wM1GHB+Ocpqc4i2dmFsQdSA1zENSjNt7s9vr9CRI UpjRrxpTS8weQnWlZvikD6WPVfn3Gv3wacURk0p2//7PG1d0y1ScVnC0wWcXdoQU Y1rrHfdb21iS5f4aQmt95cA1Y7wqDsUVlqVma2Ah/w1/Ukl2mmc= =lUtb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--