From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: fontconfig: Fix for PATH_MAX.
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 22:25:05 +0100
Message-ID: <87tw7685e6.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <909758e70bb60e503c3480e592e3e5c4@openmailbox.org>
	<1793eea4-d57c-8e1a-de98-431713b78e9a@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59562)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cl07z-0001YI-Q1
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 16:25:13 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cl07w-0004j4-MP
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 16:25:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1793eea4-d57c-8e1a-de98-431713b78e9a@gmail.com> (Manolis
	Ragkousis's message of "Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:21:30 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Manolis Ragkousis <manolis837@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, rennes@openmailbox.org

Hi,

Manolis Ragkousis <manolis837@gmail.com> skribis:

> I added a line in your commit message saying in which file you apply the
> patch and also removed all the one space indentation changes, with the
> purpose of making the patch more clear.
>
> I pushed it in core-updates.

Right in time, thanks.  :-)

BTW, I=E2=80=99d encourage you to team up with the Debian folks so that all=
 the
PATH_MAX patches end up upstream.  Otherwise they=E2=80=99ll end up occupyi=
ng
half of our repo.  ;-)

Ludo=E2=80=99.