From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: Recent change in 'guix package --search-paths' behavior? Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 01:45:24 -0700 Message-ID: <87tw4trtgb.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47097) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8NFT-0008F7-Ip for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 04:45:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8NFQ-0007sz-I5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 04:45:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d]:33645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8NFQ-0007si-Ck for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 04:45:28 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id u187so13208960pgb.0 for ; Wed, 10 May 2017 01:45:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from garuda (c-24-18-189-215.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [24.18.189.215]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l186sm4209112pgd.42.2017.05.10.01.45.25 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 May 2017 01:45:25 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, The manual says ((guix) Invoking guix package): =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- This option can also be used to compute the _combined_ search paths of several profiles. Consider this example: $ guix package -p foo -i guile $ guix package -p bar -i guile-json $ guix package -p foo -p bar --search-paths The last command above reports about the =E2=80=98GUILE_LOAD_PATH=E2= =80=99 variable, even though, taken individually, neither =E2=80=98foo=E2=80= =99 nor =E2=80=98bar=E2=80=99 would lead to that recommendation. =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I've tried this just now, and the command says nothing about the GUILE_LOAD_PATH: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix package -p foo -p bar --search-paths export PATH=3D"foo/bin" =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Is the documentation wrong, or is this a regression? =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAlkS0yQACgkQ3UCaFdgi Rp0GyxAA0q6Z/NjLV77G9bVvCExF+ypqQRs5zTQoF1r107RgLjZ33Lf8N+x4oQ43 7Q1o27RBZW1N/5BUYDqRlNpZWyw3aKgbycAYtCcBP6CKR7oOxlsYP5sFLd4QMl8n r6YghkWt4azEzUdjRBgMpAdlUieIvl1Q7tQb7adCdnZYKlFy2Ri1I/83K2UApQnL T/HS0VCqYI2R6YcYOTQkaXjBh2c6pNKDY2465yMD0DWz6reIKanKO5UQviJ/1mka tOpEUA0ZOSF6KFFR3HUOCLKqWa56GOj5YISoDa3/tf9mlfHC4YmIOgSokVEfa0OG 5Garda5guhnkGWgrqWXlGOZBtmDSpT8AfFP4nOJfvFeMFsbBqGONx1yNLi35Jg/7 zDOfVUw6eqnmesXWoHf0wIgymaCzD7Iy50ptbGSocd/FkNtuMrcZX69jparfD3Kr rRNSVenPFiAYLXxyJv+5T0wc0idVFEO7Tniw9m36Xgeb4tt//rNIphuKaCqVaEu9 CEEHmzfOv2rAEtjlbwXoVyQh3kTzS4qN0VenqB3LPwlPo+YdH4uOqwLbsntoNdvt EGh44wdb8LkHWQN0aBMBNTqRcwg666IiAkliBE1+5/1cR3Bt9C/gybPyNK/JhSSK hymFCPqOtyMmFjzz6HyZgEkgib37NqaTMPmvRtvFwrakTrLrSQY= =88KM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--