From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41212) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnhAR-00019D-MC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 04:19:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnhAM-0003S1-K3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 04:19:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnhAM-0003Rw-Gw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 04:19:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dnhAM-0003nG-At for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 04:19:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#27898] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Use 'modify-phases' syntax. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87a82jzhwg.fsf@posteo.net> <878ti3zade.fsf@fastmail.com> <8760d7z49r.fsf@posteo.net> <87shg7yjti.fsf@posteo.net> <87r2vrk70f.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 10:17:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r2vrk70f.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Thu, 31 Aug 2017 18:59:44 +0200") Message-ID: <87tw0m7ryl.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: Kei Kebreau , 27898@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Marius Bakke skribis: > Kei Kebreau writes: [...] >> The patches are in working order. The first patch would cause 1200 >> rebuilds, but the second would only cause 128 rebuilds. Should I work on >> splitting up the first patch into pieces that Hydra can handle under its >> current load? > > I'm not actually sure what's best here. It may be easiest to just throw > them both at 'staging' and accept the (hopefully few) merge conflicts. > > Ludo, any preference? The one that causes 128 rebuilds could go to =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99 (whic= h is a good thing: we won=E2=80=99t have conflicts with this part of the changes.) The rest could go to =E2=80=98staging=E2=80=99 I suppose. > If we're going staging, let's try to coordinate it so that we can start > it shortly after adding them. Maybe midnight tomorrow or Saturday UTC? > I have a few other updates in my queue that haven't been pushed yet. Sounds reasonable to me. I=E2=80=99ll let you coordinate. :-) Thanks for taking care of this! Ludo=E2=80=99.