From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Guix upgrade leads to different hashes
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 22:35:00 +0300
Message-ID: <87tvzhcpi3.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87o9pqz457.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58151)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1dz6Uf-00087X-49
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 15:35:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1dz6Ua-00034B-4G
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 15:35:09 -0400
Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]:44916)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1dz6UZ-00030J-Sz
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 15:35:04 -0400
Received: by mail-lf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id l196so7247467lfl.1
	for <help-guix@gnu.org>; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 12:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87o9pqz457.fsf@gmail.com> (Oleg Pykhalov's message of "Mon, 02
	Oct 2017 05:15:32 +0300")
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com>
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org

Oleg Pykhalov (2017-10-02 05:15 +0300) wrote:

> Hello Guix,
>
> Something strange happens on my machine with upgrades.  I check for new
> available upgrades with dry-run and get =E2=80=9Cavailable upgrades=E2=80=
=9D all the
> time.
[...]
> If I upgrade again I'll get same hashes as in =E2=80=9CCheck upgrades.=E2=
=80=9D.  Like a
> loop.  It's not related to grafts, is it?

It is: since commit fd59105c4=C2=B9, --dry-run also disables grafts, so
using just "--dry-run" is the same as "--dry-run --no-grafts".  It was
discussed in the following thread:

  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-07/msg01035.html

=C2=B9 http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3Dfd59105c49965=
db956fac73c68d8b00d068f5d5c

--=20
Alex