From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Guix upgrade leads to different hashes
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 17:10:14 +0200
Message-ID: <87tvzbj8o9.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87o9pqz457.fsf@gmail.com> <87tvzhcpi3.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87wp4c7eo5.fsf@gmail.com> <87k20catud.fsf@gnu.org>
	<874lrf52k5.fsf@gmail.com> <87efqj9v0b.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87d162tpy9.fsf@gmail.com> <87d1617ndp.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87lgkojkrl.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8vbkj91.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87fuav1k78.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50883)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1e0qk5-0002su-Od
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 11:10:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1e0qk4-0007qB-JV
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 11:10:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87fuav1k78.fsf@gmail.com> (Oleg Pykhalov's message of "Sat, 07
	Oct 2017 10:38:35 +0300")
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>, help-guix@gnu.org

Hi,

Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com> skribis:

> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>
>> Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> Could you check if this patch helps:
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/guix/scripts/package.scm b/guix/scripts/package.scm
>>>> index 4adc70522..0e365018a 100644
>>>> --- a/guix/scripts/package.scm
>>>> +++ b/guix/scripts/package.scm
>>>> @@ -604,12 +604,12 @@ and upgrades."
>>>>      (options->upgrade-predicate opts))
>>>>=20=20
>>>>    (define upgraded
>>>> -    (fold (lambda (entry transaction)
>>>> -            (if (upgrade? (manifest-entry-name entry))
>>>> -                (transaction-upgrade-entry entry transaction)
>>>> -                transaction))
>>>> -          transaction
>>>> -          (manifest-entries manifest)))
>>>> +    (fold-right (lambda (entry transaction)
>>>> +                  (if (upgrade? (manifest-entry-name entry))
>>>> +                      (transaction-upgrade-entry entry transaction)
>>>> +                      transaction))
>>>> +                transaction
>>>> +                (manifest-entries manifest)))
>>>>=20=20
>>>>    (define to-install
>>>>      (filter-map (match-lambda

[...]

> I'm sorry, actually after patching no new generation created.  But
> dry-run still shows available upgrades and that will be build some
> derivations.
>
> $ guix package -p /home/natsu/.my-guix-profile/debug-upgrade -m /home/nat=
su/dotfiles/guix/user.scm

I=E2=80=99ve pushed the above patch as eca16a3d1d9e6b2c064e0105c1015258bf27=
55f2.
Now we need to fix the UI side of things.

Could you resend the info to bug-guix@gnu.org so we keep track of it?

Thanks!

Ludo=E2=80=99.