From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#29363: Single test failure building Guix Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:55:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87tvxmwbnd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <89edb4cc307bfae5db7812abe3b4a37a@mykolab.com> <87a7zgtquv.fsf@fastmail.com> <871sksoyxj.fsf@gnu.org> <87zi7fpb0o.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37858) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHXNd-0001WD-Mk for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:56:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHXNa-0002UW-JX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:56:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44233) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHXNa-0002UR-Fy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:56:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eHXNa-000892-8M for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:56:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87zi7fpb0o.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Tue, 21 Nov 2017 22:39:03 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 29363-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Rutger Helling Heya! Marius Bakke skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> Alternately, we could comment out (> freed 0) if that=E2=80=99s enough, = with a >> comment explaining why, and do =E2=80=9Cmake update-guix-package=E2=80= =9D. That way >> we=E2=80=99d avoid the extra build phase. >> >> WDYT? > > Oh, I just re-read this message and realized you mentioned doing this in > tests/store.scm rather than working around it in the "guix" package. > > Sound good to me. I will do this and remove the workaround. Sorry for > the confusion. I see you=E2=80=99ve done this now, so I=E2=80=99m closing the bug. Thank you gentlefolks! Ludo=E2=80=99.