From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: 'core-updates' spring 2018 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 21:46:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87tvt0dlvh.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87h8p3jfke.fsf@fastmail.com> <87a7uuhejf.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f1HGL-0004Yc-UP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:01:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f1HGJ-0000z5-14 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:01:38 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21123) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f1HGI-0000yE-R5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:01:34 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: Guix-devel Hi G=C3=A1bor, > We already talked about this on #guix, and the patch removing code to > check for prlimit64 not implemented is a quite self contained commit on > the glibc tree. It is not a trivial one, and I did not try to revert that > yet, but > it might worth looking at. I would appreciate this a lot. I don=E2=80=99t think we should just revert= it. It may be better to recover the alternative code for the case where prlimit64 is not available and only use it when the kernel version is reported as 2.6.32. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net