From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Blog: Guix packaging tutorial Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:31:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87tvlu7wst.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <87in397jsd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20180914113302.elqrk3tvdkln2cde@thebird.nl> <87o9cmj0fc.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87mus6iypf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zhw02ea9.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87o9cex112.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87efdau5x2.fsf@gnu.org> <87murywuvn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lg7go8cv.fsf@gnu.org> <87va6kuyk4.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87sh1ot9m5.fsf@elephly.net> <87bm8bv4ao.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <874le2j3ox.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87o9c4qxek.fsf@elephly.net> <87sh1g9t74.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87in2cqkf9.fsf@elephly.net> <87pnwk9jl9.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87o9c49ig9.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lg789f5s.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87h8hu9fry.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAEaV-0002Ee-01 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:31:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAEaR-0002ph-2w for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:31:42 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: George Clemmer Cc: guix-devel , Ricardo Wurmus , guix-blog@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > This LGTM except ... the first paragraphs (quoted below) are an > advertisement. This is out of place in a tutorial. So, IMO, they should > simply be removed. It's a tutorial addressed to newcomers, so I believe it's important that we mention (or remind?) what Guix can do, because this is precisely what we are tackling in this tutorial. I don't think it's a problem, actually I think = it's necessary as part of the introduction. Opinions, anyone? I'm not opposed to swapping both paragraphs however. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAlu9/zIACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH9aBAgArqdYbacKpCyy0DRlXmOA9OjUVAA6YiGjZubJ0+xzbU2NSX8yyB4+ZGnN xnOQusL5Iilbo6U2KcAaXIjMiSokaEL4fzRvOspnWyUdXIq+KLt8i1wtoNhfL395 JTeKjYCShjpRs95yJYeZwkI/uUZAlec/QhTw255B6bBXf8ISDaRjBOffGfpy9C/U bRuOPGjJPbWZwqt1dAtbNkHrCn9d6iJR2l0Az94xOIWVEY7uuMT9P3Z1QfGsPwV4 zh7o+YeVHJEf7xjXnF4UVx475ZlHd+i9HZmutdIzcQQh0wEh3huoiTqrm3kwQopO zjJdc7iFksq5MU7xHTiohZfP8a26kg== =l1iO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--