From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Vong Subject: Re: Using openjdk9 as the default JDK Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 02:33:10 +0800 Message-ID: <87tvg5z4pl.fsf@gmail.com> References: <874l8hwuwk.fsf@elephly.net> <871s3lwt4y.fsf@elephly.net> <87y35tw3ih.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4XCb-00022n-OU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:43:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4X17-0004SA-2n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:31:53 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x541.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::541]:45523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4X16-0004Re-OM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:31:53 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-x541.google.com with SMTP id 125so4743681pgc.12 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 13:31:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits"'s message of "Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:32:32 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: Guix-devel --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks, people. I'm looking forwards to playing with jaotc :) G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: > Hello, > > 2019. m=C3=A1rc. 5., K 20:00 d=C3=A1tummal Alex Vong ezt =C3=ADrta: > > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > > > Hi G=C3=A1bor, > > > >>> there are a few packages now that require Java 9, such as > >>> java-eclipse-jdt-compiler-apt (that I=E2=80=99m currently packaging). > >>> > >>> We should aim to use openjdk9 as the default JDK. > >>> > >>> What do you think? > >>> > >> > >> Do you think that aiming for openjdk11 directly is too much? > >> 9 is not supported, but 11 will be supported until 2026. > >> > >> For further information see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_versio= n_history > > > > Good point. Let=E2=80=99s use openjdk11 then. > > From this page , the > latest icedtea is for openjdk 8. Does this mean that we have to patch > icedtea to build openjdk 11? > > As of openjdk9 openjdk became free, so there is no longer a need for icet= ea. That is why > there is no newer version, and you can find openjdk 9 10 and 11 in guix. > > Best regards, > g_bor --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQQwb8uPLAHCXSnTBVZh71Au9gJS8gUCXIqeZgAKCRBh71Au9gJS 8ubXAP9LbvTJ2I8t5/g3ogcNAQtvxQoAZzpf7koeL9Vyl6K7VAEAoWTACf+s/cmf t/rzvQxkoSu1CFdyWZRK1l7gGRxH0AU= =iTXc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--