From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Pykhalov Subject: bug#34884: guix describe fails with --format=json and --format=recutils Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 20:40:21 +0300 Message-ID: <87tvg1tn5m.fsf@gmail.com> References: <871s37unyz.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zhpuucxh.fsf@gmail.com> <87ef75y0es.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5a1m-0007pn-Cs for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 13:56:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5ZmQ-0004xP-Um for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 13:41:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34171) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5ZmQ-0004wP-Qm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 13:41:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h5ZmQ-0006hG-I9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 13:41:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87ef75y0es.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:40:27 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Pierre Neidhardt , 34884@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: [=E2=80=A6] > Initially the intent was to warn users that =E2=80=98GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=E2= =80=99 is set > and not captured in the output of =E2=80=98guix describe=E2=80=99, becaus= e fundamentally > it cannot be captured reliably. > > Thus, what about something as attached instead? OK, no problem for me. ;-) Thanks for explanation. [=E2=80=A6] Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEcjhxI46s62NFSFhXFn+OpQAa+pwFAlyOhoUACgkQFn+OpQAa +pzWWQ//cjhIAWXH4D4r123eQLil0IjEzcNn+AGOM1PHvUN5X63apSS5G5Fcigj1 ItMGga/+mBRKRkZyecosN1zb88IKAG8+KMmjWWeCKCih+kznTmIb4qVqjM4ZUDAc 2Zte+aLkZ4Kv6AkfWzvNpPuvEc91gh/t7Ijkn9dqdh4bzqiImerWPn81xE/eqcsC Bv59kfVY9cRoUCNpP/Iey7x7KAmMd2wWQdNPOzL8Nuwc2uqFQLIL7//8+RCUrKNX H2awFeAV7IXYTJCEruDGo+qiUyUqlri8XraRMcRJcaJnNlKcdjtuUDJc2cpP5uc7 MnMp1k/EtfrbdwFgMcNmrVunEYrQy3UM6iqbJtR/CaiHOIm6Zy+EHQQh25CnLW3o LHg3/sfOVd3m4yKwI9IhM0L9zb5BwHEwjKG/bN/FQX/bMi8WvXcZI9eaycV3JzA3 RgxIxrU+yKsWZEdxL2j0ZjNMA8MOg7z3M6yW6UQkbU1x2fXc9e8/Q22NfZvhNO1H All9QJxKDFaCZbgnQbCz62GoZ1ayD2EZAmMTCy7cYOf1+4X1scOkiz7bV0zhm7cN kIOLb1H4Nt0vwwRGy0ySqdqGJPCLG/e9n7epP46hz0RQLx7HPUjN5er0S65PFGTQ 8uMc0jvyOkt8Nb50lTxH8Xd/0Il3sJzV8GPcv+cJ8AeAlfZV9Ng= =23GL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--