From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#34995: `guix pull` crash on commit 69cae3d33 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:40:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87tvfqht2i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190326012744.GA12308@jasmine.lan> <87imw6s2u5.fsf@wookimus.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46736) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8iZy-0000eY-0I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 05:41:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8iZw-0007GO-Tk for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 05:41:09 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45506) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8iZq-0007DE-1n for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 05:41:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h8iZp-0008C0-V3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 05:41:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87imw6s2u5.fsf@wookimus.net> (Chad Walstrom's message of "Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:59:32 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Chad Walstrom , Leo Famulari , Mark H Weaver , Konrad Hinsen Cc: 34995-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Chad Walstrom skribis: > ./gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150:4: In procedure inputs: > Wrong number of arguments to # > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/dml4spg4jl3nqq= qgsw76pj74bash1h8h-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: "6c177f6140cba250ad68= c5a83c312f395b6e48b4"; system: "x86_64-linux"; > host version: "0.16.0"; pull-version: 1). > Please report it by email to . This bug was introduced about 11 hours ago when I pushed abd4d6b33dba4de228e90ad15a8efb456fcf7b6e. It=E2=80=99s due to an excess of confidence and insufficient testing on my = side (I hadn=E2=80=99t rebuilt the package modules locally, so those modules were still using the old ABI and everything was fine); my apologies for the breakage. That also revealed an abstraction leakage I was unaware of: https://issues.guix.info/issue/34999 Thank you all for reporting the issue! Ludo=E2=80=99.