From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55103) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPw60-0004kW-DA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:33:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPvr8-0005VF-NA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:18:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPvr8-0005Uo-Ju for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:18:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hPvr8-0006Y1-Cj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:18:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#35641] [PATCH] services: gdm: Include user profile in D-Bus paths. Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87v9yksrfd.fsf@ngyro.com> <87v9yizc2p.fsf@gnu.org> <87tve051hi.fsf@ngyro.com> Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 23:17:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tve051hi.fsf@ngyro.com> (Timothy Sample's message of "Sat, 11 May 2019 13:45:29 -0400") Message-ID: <87tvdztlsj.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Timothy Sample Cc: 35641-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Timothy, Timothy Sample skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Timothy Sample skribis: >> >> [...] >> >>> Is it okay to assume that =E2=80=9C.guix-profile=E2=80=9D is the user= =E2=80=99s profile like >>> this? If it isn=E2=80=99t okay in general, is it okay enough for now? >> >> In this particular case, I=E2=80=99d say it=E2=80=99s OK. >> >> Do we have any other option on the table anyway? > > We could run D-Bus from a login shell. The reason I didn=E2=80=99t opt f= or this > is that GDM launches D-Bus from a stripped-down environment. It=E2=80=99= s not > clear to me if there=E2=80=99s a reason for doing so, or if it was just t= he way > the code came together. Essentially, I=E2=80=99m trying to be conservati= ve. > > I=E2=80=99m still holding out hope that a future =E2=80=9Cuser sessions= =E2=80=9D feature in Guix > will make all of these hacks go away. :) As we accumulate the hacks, motivation rises! :-) > I pushed a nicer version (following the style of the =E2=80=9Cxinitrc=E2= =80=9D code) > with a long comment as dcb3a0fe0a086b4762a721e9b1da64826d5160d0. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.