From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: Shall we merge wip-gnome3.30 to core-updates? Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:25:16 -0400 Message-ID: <87tvcpppyr.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87v9xgytui.fsf@posteo.net> <87blz77rbo.fsf@devup.no> <87ftod3ww4.fsf@posteo.net> <20190616085954.GA1460@macbook41> <871rzt51ye.fsf@devup.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35464) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hcW61-0003C4-S0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:25:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hcW60-0007xO-MC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:25:25 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:41947) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hcW60-0007tk-2a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:25:24 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55ED52400E6 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:25:19 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <871rzt51ye.fsf@devup.no> (Marius Bakke's message of "Sun, 16 Jun 2019 11:11:53 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marius Bakke writes: > Efraim Flashner writes: > >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:09:47PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: >>> Hello again Marius, >>>=20 >>> Marius Bakke writes: >>>=20 >>> > Hi Kei, >>> > >>> > Kei Kebreau writes: >>> > >> <...> >>>=20 >>> * The samba package seems to require the "rpcgen" binary as part of its >>> build process, but I don't know which package includes that binary. I >>> know it appears somewhere in the process of building the "gcc-toolchain" >>> package, but I'd rather not include that whole package if it isn't >>> necessary. >> >> >> rpcgen seems to be in glibc I saw that too, but running "guix build glibc" gives a glibc without the "rpcgen" binary. > > Not since commit 3670ea70e2e932969a3ffc0acf75a714c7b42540 ;-) Aha! > > This patch allows Samba to build. Other distributions seem to give > Samba libtirpc as input too, so I haven't finished investigating yet: > ... > @Kei: If you have tested this branch elsewhere, I think it's okay to > merge even if it does not yet build on 'core-updates'. Great! I'll give the branch a test on top of "master" first. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAl0GUUwACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg0MNRAAqAhuiIJ/JGv1mBbN7Yle9hCZuk+7IU63Zx605Ot7DjecAwkuGdY1J0FQ zNZmHWA3ffk7CT836eLOCB0FXHBL6LSP6m6cMjWzKsrIKkfVeQrDf91lXqD9uyf8 UKI24DkLEYF0VRyf9M8VLRodTLQpZ4XPQ47PCSGbUTVMwklOeUPYdnaHil2wrfxR zVJd6YgUXYjnSlVCWdCi2o4RT+OpWPI63tfRjYHS4vx4lKgjygM8Jse0YUIbjO8i idlusulXbAC46jbTZ7vHyVeKheYKNH9xL+19NocxTNwiQGkb7MPK9yH/2HFc7kpY EGnomOb1YGYnzOPm1gVm8Ry76rmeI6j4ifvAPqCAlwmoiXpj2NvtPx235juIKw+I LDcl+PbJ17taPyAJjj/ZNPA30GU9w3jELQty648m/QefnpelddMQ1oB+qaAaf1Gl oKiNjwJymTNagUhv9a3XXxdhiYXkKUtoQt8xCq6I1rfVx/yUxuJMpAJr/YO0dEtM fweS8GarMabYLdE3KwfBU06dNDgxjXU15mMasRvZbdHGHXT4LXtxy05Op/V78Gxs O/4UVV3TM789UqdF3Tjj4X00pnodg2PbV8gAkDvnSGdKmJ7ABSaj5nNumbf9qseY 0DJ+EeevBhVETMpzf/wIrt+mfdiEqGY0DzGViuAxTZTlNZVeSpw= =gHOW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--