From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Testing needed for lzip substitutes!
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:22:00 +0200
Message-ID: <87tvco1s93.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87ftopg23r.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnnrf2tc.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87lfy89zqi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a7eoync8.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87zhmjizki.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55015)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1hcnpz-0000UX-Rg
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 05:22:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87zhmjizki.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of
 "Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:15:09 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hello,

Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> When replying to a days-old message, please consider quoting the
>> relevant bits.  :-)
>
> Hmmm, actually, why would it be a matter of age?  I think it's only a
> matter of context, and someone browsing the archive years later will not
> mind if a reply was sent 1 day or 1 week later.  All that matters is the
> full thread.  In my opinion a single email
> is useless when not in the context of the entire thread.
> So I believe that it makes more sense for email clients to use
> threading than not.
>
> Or maybe that's not what you meant :p

What I meant is that it=E2=80=99s easier for me (and for others I believe) =
if
there=E2=80=99s a bit of context.  Gnus doesn=E2=80=99t display the whole t=
hread by
default, so I have to explicitly ask it to display it, etc.

In a way, it=E2=80=99s a MUA issue, and mu4e-conversation seems to be a gre=
at
solution to that problem, but not everyone uses it yet.  ;-)

> So I've tried with both qualif and ci, and qualif did not publish any
> substitutes for me.  It works on ci.guix.gnu.org though, and I get
> lzipped substitutes!  Hooray!

Yay!  qualif is gone now.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.