From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: Packaging Jami progress
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 07:33:38 +0100
Message-ID: <87tv5d2gn1.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <20191215211230.66fea79e@interia.pl> <875zihclep.fsf@elephly.net>
 <20191222002815.4db8e9ca@interia.pl> <87d0cgpzqo.fsf@elephly.net>
 <20191223204317.3069e8ba@kompiuter> <20191225023416.0b36b90c@kompiuter>
 <20191227195731.6b869970@interia.pl>
 <CAE4v=phL+JrTnOihad+w=zC1+5Tz4jwHpdejiD3mY2tckmJdRg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20191227224639.5b7d1e74@interia.pl> <8736d4kcue.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <20200101162246.677552a6@kompiuter>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48522)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1inGzl-00089r-F6
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 02:03:42 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1inGzk-0005pj-AY
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 02:03:41 -0500
Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21190)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1inGzj-0005k2-U5
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 02:03:40 -0500
In-reply-to: <20200101162246.677552a6@kompiuter>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Jan <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Jan <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl> writes:

> Bad news:
> I still haven't got any response that would solve the bug present only
> in our package:
> https://git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux/ring-client-gnome/issues/1123
> I have not much experience with debugging and reading backtraces, but
> could it be there's something wrong with our glibc package?

That=E2=80=99s very unlikely as we would probably see errors like this in m=
ost
packages then.

cogl issues an optimized instruction (__memcpy_ssse3), which then fails.

I=E2=80=99m just guessing, but I wonder if this comment is a hint at what=
=E2=80=99s
wrong here:

    ;; NOTE: mutter exports a bundled fork of cogl, so when making changes =
to
    ;; cogl, corresponding changes may be appropriate in mutter as well.

cogl is up to date, but mutter is not (it=E2=80=99s tied to the current Gno=
me
version in Guix, which is a few releases behind).

It may also be interesting to see if this can be reproduced on Wayland.

--
Ricardo