From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal for a blog contribution on reproducible computations
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 23:20:44 +0100
Message-ID: <87tv4wmkeb.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <8D474474-AF4C-4B03-9D38-3BB089BEE4EB@lepiller.eu>
 <87tv6ec048.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <14A62244-3626-4146-B40E-BC5CED4B78D3@lepiller.eu>
 <m1lfrqrd3f.fsf@khs-macbook.home>
 <CAJ3okZ2hKBPZNthZpBQ=xibxzjJu7_gO8HoEcAzxaZcNbR_0gg@mail.gmail.com>
 <m1a785r4q6.fsf@khs-macbook.home> <m1blrfxnes.fsf@fastmail.net>
 <878smfutv8.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m18smebacn.fsf@ordinateur-de-catherine--konrad.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35452)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1irr1r-00083y-OU
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:20:48 -0500
In-Reply-To: <m18smebacn.fsf@ordinateur-de-catherine--konrad.home> (Konrad
 Hinsen's message of "Sat, 11 Jan 2020 10:39:36 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Hi,

I had missed that message.

Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Another thing that comes to mind: would it make sense to mention =E2=80=
=98guix
>> graph=E2=80=99 in the part where you pipe the output of =E2=80=98guix sh=
ow=E2=80=99 to =E2=80=98recsel=E2=80=99,
>> etc.?
>
> Forgot that one, sorry. Yes, it would make sense, though I'd place it a
> bit later in the text. But I'd have to figure out first how how the
> various options of "guix graph" relate exactly to what I am writing.
>
>   =E2=80=98package=E2=80=99
>        This is the default type used in the example above.  It shows the
>        DAG of package objects, excluding implicit dependencies.  It is
>        concise, but filters out many details.
>
> Are "implicit dependencies" those added by the build system? If yes,
> this edges in this graph would correspond to package-direct-inputs.

Exactly.

>   =E2=80=98bag=E2=80=99
>        Similar to =E2=80=98bag-emerged=E2=80=99, but this time including =
all the bootstrap
>        dependencies.
>
> And that is package-closure with arrows defined by bag-direct-inputs, rig=
ht?

Yes.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.