From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45373)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jBkS3-0006fH-D6
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:22:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jBkS2-0008R0-E8
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:22:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47358)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jBkS2-0008PZ-4o
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:22:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jBkS1-0001ua-Vb
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:22:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#40009] [core-updates PATCH]: Use per-architecture GCC for
 libstdc++-boot0
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40009.B40009.15838680817301@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200310111227.GX1423@E5400>
References: <20200310111227.GX1423@E5400>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:21:08 +0100
Message-ID: <87tv2wyq1n.fsf@devup.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>, 40009@debbugs.gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

> I've tested this on aarch64 and there were no problems. It also
> provides a nice framework for other architectures as they become
> supported.

What is the benefit of this patch?  I'd prefer to keep libstdc++-boot0
identical across architectures for simplicity, unless there is a good
reason to do otherwise (say, porting to a new architecture).

Now we could end up in a situation where someone patches GCC5 on
'master' and accidentally triggers a full rebuild on AArch64.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl5n6KQACgkQoqBt8qM6
VPp9awgAqGPHPbG/V1/y4CmmHJFJ7yP9VkPO1N225ddGTDZBDrrxazstZoAh/RHo
E5wI21FKadZ1p/l9cJJZlmuoUkeZJpZx38e9Bn/JJvzu7hMCVhx5B3FlpXJow9m4
Qa5L7xa5V/Dj041BVpo6tU2D6EUjxliHwawQCFny6ZjM+Ak9yGkd1oLTZb0GghSS
gcqZTxwS2dOrP5YovuwTgnroKgLwifliYaqFzx59kJbMhoTXYH+iywMdGvpsYJ/5
uNjKmstYu2CSNg4oq98Ox5Kio8E3R4P9GDmyZXXKHG5kpt6ALsQSE6ScRRLST2pt
nK/ZlIC83LHZFbnZ/PuXs1/LMKIbFQ==
=z3m6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--