From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: bug#40079: emacs-elpy-1.31.0: failed to build Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:05:55 -0400 Message-ID: <87tv2iisvw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <170df3c9d14.f2220d0233452.7833229319796639139@zoho.com> <87d0969ae6.fsf@devup.no> <87v9mylmd7.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50873) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jFPnD-00064Q-Tx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:07:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFPnC-0005EO-S1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:07:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFPnC-0005EI-MZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:07:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jFPnC-0005a1-31 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:07:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87v9mylmd7.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Fri, 20 Mar 2020 22:58:28 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: sirgazil , 40079@debbugs.gnu.org Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> sirgazil via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: >> >>> I couldn't upgrade the packages in my user profile because "emacs-elpy"= check phase fails.=20 >>> >>> >>> ## Steps to reproduce >>> >>> 1. guix pull >>> 2. guix build emacs-elpy >>> >>> >>> ## Unexpected result >>> >>> >>> The output of the check phase: >>> >>> --------------------------- >>> starting phase `check' >>> >>> Can=E2=80=99t guess python-indent-offset, using defaults: 4 >> >> This seems to stem from the update of 'python-black' in >> 5f603fab23e7df7e7b76566b3add24b65e92f807. Reverting that commit makes >> this package build. >> >> @Ricardo: Any objections to reverting the commit? > > I=E2=80=99d rather not revert but add an older variant of python-black fo= r elpy. Perhaps the issue would vanish if we move to Elpy 1.32? I had started packaging it, but hit some issues. Maxim