From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id oEQ7DRSKLF90eAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 22:54:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id KNMACRSKLF8pGgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 22:54:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B567940668 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60294 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3om0-0003UH-Q8 for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 18:54:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59090) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3olu-0003Tw-Ew for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 18:54:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43557) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3olu-0007Ik-5j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 18:54:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3olt-0006J9-T0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 18:54:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42639] [PATCH] bump Node to 14.6 Resent-From: Jelle Licht Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 22:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42639 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= , r@gravity Cc: formbi@protonmail.com, 42639@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42639-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42639.159675443924239 (code B ref 42639); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 22:54:01 +0000 Received: (at 42639) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2020 22:53:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55103 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3olr-0006It-Il for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 18:53:59 -0400 Received: from mail1.fsfe.org ([217.69.89.151]:51122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3olo-0006Ie-Mg for 42639@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 18:53:58 -0400 From: Jelle Licht In-Reply-To: <20200806220124.rc32clbnwozgbnqs@gravity> References: <87ime31ilf.fsf@jlicht.xyz> <87ft971i3v.fsf@jlicht.xyz> <20200806220124.rc32clbnwozgbnqs@gravity> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 00:53:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87tuxfe67y.fsf@jlicht.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=fsfe.org (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.59 X-TUID: OyK1hwCS2cwg Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka writes: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 11:37:24PM +0200, Jelle Licht wrote: >> It seems this is not actually the case, but swc still seems to depend on >> having a rust nightly compiler available. >>=20 >> - Jelle > > It seems that a nightly compiler is only used for an optimization flag: > commenting out the -Z thinlto=3Dno line in .cargo/config in swc's repo > made it pass `cargo check' just fine. Indeed it does; does that fix this problem for us? At this stage, I end up with a library that was built successfully, but no clue how to continue from here. Either way, progress! ;) - Jelle